Tampilkan postingan dengan label Desktop. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Desktop. Tampilkan semua postingan

Rabu, 26 Agustus 2015

ASUS M11AD-US006O Intel Core i7-4770S, 16GB, 2TB, Desktop with Windows 7 Home Premium

ASUS M11AD-US006O Intel Core i7-4770S, 16GB, 2TB, Desktop with Windows 7 Home Premium..


ASUS M11AD-US006O Intel Core i7-4770S, 16GB, 2TB, Desktop with Windows 7 Home Premium

Buy ASUS M11AD-US006O Intel Core i7-4770S, 16GB, 2TB, Desktop with Windows 7 Home Premium By Asus

Most helpful customer reviews

43 of 43 people found the following review helpful.
5ASUS M11AD-US006O
By Bryan Feldman
I selected this computer for speed and reliability. Since it was to be used primarily for software development, I didn't need a graphics card. And I definitely didn't want Windows 8. So far (after about a week) I am very satisfied.

When the computer arrived it was well packaged. I opened it up to make sure everything was intact and seated securely; it was. Inside this computer is simple and neat with well-routed wires and lots of open space.

The computer has the Core i7-4770S processor running at 3.10 GHz, not 3.4 as stated, and 16 GB (15.7 usable) RAM. It includes Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1. It has a 2 TB hard disk which is divided into two partitions: WIN7 (C:) which has 745 GB usable and DATA (D:) which has 1.07 TB available and comes completely empty.

It comes with some Asus bloatware, some of which run at startup and you may want to disable. Some of the apps may be useful but I have not looked into them yet. This computer includes Bing Bar which states it will collect information about you and you must agree in order to accept the Windows license agreement. And it includes McAfee Internet Security 2012 edition with a one-month subscription.

Initial setup is straightforward and smooth. Once it's complete, you have an option of making a system image backup, which worked well, used four DVDs and took about two hours. First thing I did after that was to remove the Bing Bar and install a non-Microsoft browser.

It has two front USB 2.0 ports and four rear. I would have liked more but I use a small, unpowered hub to attach more stuff. It also has two USB 3.0 ports in the rear. One in the front would have been useful for external hard drives. Note the image of the back of the computer shown on this page is not the correct one and the features pictured there vary significantly from this PC; you can download the documentation from the Asus website to see what it really looks like. The PC is quiet except for a somewhat noisy hard drive, but I am comparing it to my old system; it had an SSD which of course is silent.

The motherboard-based Intel 4600 graphics has 1.75 GB of RAM, supports two HD monitors with Aero Glass, and performs well for my non-gaming use. Also built in is Realtek High Definition Audio. It has a 350-watt peak, 286-watt continuous power supply.

Here's the key point about this computer: it is FAST. Really, really fast. Large programs like Eclipse ADT and Photoshop load amazingly quickly. Big software projects compile in half the time they used to or less even though my prior machine was not slow. The Windows Experience Index gets a 5.9 overall score with the primary hard disk data transfer rate scoring lowest (5.9), graphics scoring 6.7, and RAM and processor scoring a lovely 7.7.

It came with a keyboard and mouse which I did not use and so cannot comment on. The case feels solid and well-made and is handsome and not too big.

Any more questions, please ask and I will add them to this review.

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
5Satisfied Customer
By David E. Mowery
My wife is very pleased with the purchase and so am I. We feel that we received a good bargain.

9 of 15 people found the following review helpful.
5ASUS M11AD-US0060 Intel Corei7-4770S, 16 GB, 2TB Desktop with Windows 7
By Chris C. Mills
I really like my new computer with Windows 7!! It's so much faster and more efficient than my last computer. I was very happy to find a new computer that still had Windows 7 available. Windows 8 is very confusing. Windows 7 works much better.

See all 3 customer reviews...More...


Sabtu, 22 Agustus 2015

TP-LINK TL-SG1008D 10/100/1000Mbps 8-Port Gigabit Desktop Switch, 10Gbps Switching Capacity

TP-LINK TL-SG1008D 10/100/1000Mbps 8-Port Gigabit Desktop Switch, 10Gbps Switching Capacity..


TP-LINK TL-SG1008D 10/100/1000Mbps 8-Port Gigabit Desktop Switch, 10Gbps Switching Capacity

Special Price TP-LINK TL-SG1008D 10/100/1000Mbps 8-Port Gigabit Desktop Switch, 10Gbps Switching Capacity By TP-Link

Most helpful customer reviews

111 of 119 people found the following review helpful.
5Fantastic little switch.
By J. Bair
I wanted to hard-wire the network for my home theater setup. Most notably, an Xbox 360 (100Mbit), a PS3 (1000Mbit), an AppleTV 3rd gen (100Mbit), and the television itself (LN52B630, unsure about speed). Previous, I had the Xbox plugged in directly to my Airport Extreme over CAT5e, and used the wireless on the PS3/AppleTV. However, I wanted to hard-wire the AppleTV for airplay mirroring to speed things up a bit. And if I was going to split the one gigabit connection into more than one, I figure I might as well wire up everything, and a 5 port gigabit switch was exactly what I needed.

Looking around Amazon, this guy had really top notch reviews. Online research showed NewEgg reviewers giving this little guy glowing reviews, with a few nags here and there. There are a few neat hacks people have done to make this switch even more useful, but I won't get into those. I figured for $20, this little guy should do the trick. Plus, Amazon has a great return policy for faulty products, so why not give it a try. I've been burned by high quality names dying out on me for no good reason, so I figured I'd give this little guy a go.

So far, fantastic! I wasn't able to do a very good test to max out the line speed, but the speed did not change between no switch and the switch over the same wire. I checked all ports and they all worked at 1000BaseT just fine, and latency was consistent across all ports. Also, I confirmed that mixed modes caused no issues, as noted by my above devices. Of the 5 ports, 2 are gigabit (uplink to the Airport Extreme and the PS3), and the AppleTV/Xbox are 100Mbit - the TV is most likely 10BaseT, but it may be 100BaseT. Everything is working together flawlessly, though since it's for a home theater setup, it's not being taxed heavily.

If it dies on me or if things end up not working out, I will be sure to come back and update this review. But I figured I'd toss my two cents for other people running into my situation.

63 of 69 people found the following review helpful.
5It stays cool and that means I save money!
By Bubba Guppy
I needed another switch and I bought this one because it was inexpensive, was supposed to be energy-saving, and was well-reviewed across the net.
It works very well, and it runs cool - barely warm to the touch.
Compare that with my Cisco 5-port gigabit switch which is always HOT to the touch.
Heat is wasted electricity and ultimately challenges component reliability.
I would recommend this product to anyone.

26 of 29 people found the following review helpful.
5The Power Consumption Challenge!
By William Hefner
When it comes to unmanaged home gigabit ethernet switches, there isn't really much these days that would set one brand apart from another. Gigabit switches pretty much just sit there and do what they are supposed to do without notice, if they are built right. The specs for gigabit switching haven't changed at all over the years, so manufacturers have had to find other ways to set themselves apart. The battlefront these days seems to be who can build switches the smallest, the cheapest or use the least amount of power. TP-Link seems to have settled on the latter, with the release of it's 8 port TL-SG108 gigabit ethernet switch.

So, the question is... Did TP-LINK actually build a switch that uses less power than other models? Yes, they did. Although the tests I conducted were not under sterile, laboratory conditions, they are certainly accurate enough to show that the TP-Link switch uses significantly less power than switches sold just 2-3 years ago. Running idle (no connections or traffic) the TL-SG108 barely draws any current at all. Perhaps 1 Watt, at most, which is most likely consumed by the LEDs it displays to indicate that it is operational. This is a tad better than switches made a generation ago, but consistent with most other desktop switches made these days.

Under a full network load, the most power that I saw the switch consume was about 4 Watts. I used a consumer Kill-A-Watt brand power meter for testing purposes and set out to test some other 8 port desktop gigabit ethernet switches that I had at my office. Using the same ethernet connections on the same network (representing a similar network load) a handful of the newest switches I tested consumed roughly equal amounts of power. Specifically, I tested models including the TrendNet TEG-S8g, TrendNet TEG-S80g and Zyxel GS108B. All of these models have similar form factors and features and are from the latest generation of each company's products. All seemed to fluctuate between 2 to 4 Watts of power, depending upon the network load at that particular moment. In this sense, the TP-Link TL-SG108 doesn't really stand out above the rest, but it definitely hangs in there with the best of them. The other models I tested also boasted consuming "less power". I suspect that most current models sold these days would be similar in power consumption though.

Compared to previous generations of gigabit ethernet switches, the TP-Link TL-SG108 fared much better. In particular, I put a switch that is still active on our network to the test and the results were impressive. In particular, I tested a 3COM 8 port OfficeConnect model 1670800a gigabit ethernet switch and found that it consumed anywhere from 4-8 Watts under the same load. That's close to twice the power consumed by the TP-Link. Similarly, a Netgear GS605 5 port gigabit ethernet switch (definitely not one of their newer models) had a pretty constant load of about 7 Watts under the same conditions. With fewer ports and close to same size, I expected the Netgear to do a bit better, but the meter doesn't lie. I suspect that the Netgear switch is probably about 5 years old. I didn't have any other, older gigabit ethernet switches left to test, but I suspect that the results would have been roughly similar.

What it all boils down to seems to be that if you are using an older, gigabit ethernet switch you could save 50% (maybe more, maybe less) on your electricity costs by switching to a TP-LINK TL-SG108 or a similar model based upon recent advancements in technology. In real-world terms, we are talking about 5 Watts max. Over the course of a year, this would amount to (at most) about $1 in savings as of this writing. Obviously, if you have an older gigabit switch in place, running out and buying a new one isn't going to pay for itself anytime soon and will just consume more landfill space, if you care about that sort of thing. If you need to buy a new gigabit switch anyway though, the TP-Link TL-SG108 is definitely one of the lowest power-consuming models you will find on the market these days. It compares very favorably to similar models that sell for higher prices. It seems very solidly built and considering the fact that it contains no moving parts, one should expect it to last longer than the amount of time it will take to make gigabit switching technology obsolete.

See all 897 customer reviews...More...


Jumat, 07 Agustus 2015

HP Slate 21-k100 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop (Android 4.2)

HP Slate 21-k100 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop (Android 4.2)..


HP Slate 21-k100 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop (Android 4.2)

Special Price HP Slate 21-k100 Touchscreen All-in-One Desktop (Android 4.2) By HP

Most helpful customer reviews

53 of 55 people found the following review helpful.
5Excellent.
By Jerry
Beautiful touch screen. Fast performance. Video chat. Nice keyboard and mouse. Millions of applications, movies and songs via Google Play Store. Boxed up the old windows computer. Absolutely love it.

50 of 52 people found the following review helpful.
5Nothing else like it
By Savoeun Thet
I highly recommend this product for family use. For $399 you are getting a 21" Android tablet. I'm not a tech expert so I'm not going to detail the specs, but my whole family now flocks to this device. It's an amazing product. I wish HP can market this more to the mainstream crowd.

41 of 45 people found the following review helpful.
5Fabulous Deal
By Mr.Nice
Simply Fabulous. I have been dreaming of an Android Desktop and here it is. For $399 we get a 21.5 1080p Monitor, Touch Screen, Camera, Keyboard (love the shortcut keys) and a Mouse - just unbelievable.

As an Android programmer, I am thrilled to use this as a testing system as well.

Thank you HP, Google & Amazon - a viable alternative to the Virus Machine (aka Windows).

>> Update to the review after having used it for a week or so:
The computer almost behaves like a TV - you can on/off and the Android comes up immediately. They also have a shortcut power off/on on the Keyboard.

The keyboard has a nice appearance but wish it was much softer. A bluetooth keyboard might have been nicer though it comes with extra long wires.

One of the drawbacks are with App that only works in portrait mode - the App appears in the horizontal direction and cannot be used. Hopefully, all the Apps will have the Landscape mode - nevertheless most popular apps are OK.

See all 63 customer reviews...More...


Jumat, 31 Juli 2015

Dell Inspiron i3847-5846BK Desktop (Windows 7)

Dell Inspiron i3847-5846BK Desktop (Windows 7)..


Dell Inspiron i3847-5846BK Desktop (Windows 7)

Special Price Dell Inspiron i3847-5846BK Desktop (Windows 7) By Dell

Most helpful customer reviews

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful.
4Great computer was missing its driver
By sooner
This was a good value for the price with lots of tech but as delivered it was missing a driver for the cd and required tech support from Dell to correct.

11 of 13 people found the following review helpful.
5My First Dell
By nettie7
With the demise of Win XP and the incompatibility of my old desktop with Win 7 or 9, this PC is ideal. My choice now is Win 7, but this one arrives with an upgrade disk to Win 8 as well. It is fast and user friendly.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful.
5Fast delivery, on time and well protected
By Don Hintz
Fair price with windows 7 software. Easy to operate and had it up & running in less than 30 mins.

See all 14 customer reviews...More...


Minggu, 05 Juli 2015

Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770

Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770..


Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770

Buy Intel Core i7-4770 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.4 GHZ LGA 1150 8 MB Cache BX80646I74770 By Intel

Most helpful customer reviews

60 of 69 people found the following review helpful.
3Even less improvement than expected
By CRT
Quick Review:

While the i7-4770 is a solid processor for desktop users seeking power and bang for the buck and not concerned about the highest clock speed, it is not worth the upgrade if you are on a Sandy Bridge or newer CPU. I upgraded from a much older platform and I would have waited for the 2014 Haswell-e/Haswell refresh chips if the capacitors in my old motherboard had hung in a little longer.

Pros:

+ Supports Intel's Transaction Synchronization Extensions (TSX): This is not supported by the initial K series Haswell offerings and represents a capability that, as an executive responsible for software development, I would leverage in any effort where I could not justify the investment in fine-grained thread synchronization. I expect that game, CAD and multimedia developers are going to be looking to leverage this. As of this writing, this is the fastest consumer chip that supports it.

+ Good performance relative to current offerings: Stock i7-4770 chips do well on benchmark and real world tests. As of this writing (July 10,2013), cpubenchmark.net reports an average CPU Mark of 10,126. That is higher than any stock chip under 580USD, even beating the 4770k at stock speeds.

Cons:

- Surprisingly high retail price at introduction for what it is, I paid 310USD with an Intel box price of 312USD - expect prices to drop as initial fervor dies down and the Haswell line matures.

- Potentially superseded quickly by the i7-4771 (same capabilities with higher speed, possibly driven by improvements in binning with process maturity).

- Surprisingly disappointing performance improvement over previous generations (particularly memory operations).

- Extremely limited overclocking.

Neutral:

o Requires an LGA1150 motherboard - you can't reuse your old one if you wanted to, but LGA1150 chipsets natively have greater peripheral support

BACKGROUND

If you are reading this than I expect you either typically build your own PCs, are considering your first build or are considering upgrading an existing LGA1150 PC (assuming you are reading this in 2014 or later). In each of these cases, you are not the typical user so I will not waste time on basics or information that is available elsewhere. I will give you my opinions and the reasoning behind them and hope they will help you making your own informed decision.

I have been building and tweaking PCs since the early 1990's, but I have only done a half dozen builds for personal or family use. For my primary desktop I tend to build 1 tier from the top (enthusiast, high bang for the buck) and keep it for a long time. It takes me about a day to build a machine and get the OS to boot, but it seems like it takes months before I have the applications fully configured. This build replaced a late 2003 Pentium 4 3.2GHz Northwood Socket 478 build. Yep - almost 10 years. And I actually use my machine - Catia, heat transfer simulations, photoshop CS, HDTV video capture and editing, large MS project plans, various SW development environments and the standard Office applications. I do occasionally game, but not a lot of FPSs. The Socket 478 machine performed as needed until late 2012 when the lack of 64bit and being limited to 2 concurrent threads became an issue (I have access to other hardware, so it was never a road block).

While the new i7-4770 based machine is faster, I am surprised by how little improved it is in real world applications. The most conservative general application of Moore's law says that the new machine should be able to process about 30 times as much information (double every 2 years over 10 years). Having lived with the new machine for few weeks now I am convinced that it is not that much faster. I have used PassMark's Performance Test to benchmark and maintain my personal machines since 2001 so I can provide some objective comparisons in addition to a thumb in the wind estimate...

Using Performance Test v5 with the 4770 machine running 8 threads vs. 2 threads on my old 3.2GHz P4

CPU Mark: 7146.7(i7-4770) vs 665.0(P4) - about 10.75 times the CPU Mark of the old machine

With the 4770 machine running only 2 threads its rating drops to 3343.3 (~5x)

With regards to the built in 4600 graphics - the P4 at the time of testing was sporting a Radeon HD 3800 AGP 8X...

3D Graphics Mark: 2415.0 vs 2358.8 (almost no change)
2D Graphics Mark: 260.8 vs 114.3 (2.25x)

This is a bit of an unfair comparison as a midrange modern dedicated graphics card would likely improve the new machine's performance by an order of magnitude, but it does put Intel's onboard GPU in perspective.

And the real disappointment - memory...

Memory Mark: 992.7 vs 564.9 (~1.75x)

The new machine has much more memory and PerformanceTest 5.0 is 32bit so the new machine has considerable addressing overhead handicapping it, but this really shows how little difference there is between ancient low latency DDR-440 and comparatively high latency modern DDR3-1866.

There is one category where we see the type of improvement we would hope for after 10 years - storage performance. Disk access has always been a bottle neck for me so the P4 was loaded with two Raptors in a RAID0 configuration for the primary boot and application drive. The 4770 machine has a single SSD. The result:

Disk Mark: 19406.6 vs 418.2 (~46x)

The overall PassMark rating of the new system in PerformanceTest v5 (running 8 threads) is 6322.9 versus 677.3 or slightly over 9 times the performance of the old P4 machine.

These numbers back up the way the new machine feels - much faster, but not shockingly so. In fact, shockingly disappointing would be more accurate.

Did I get a bad 4770? Bad motherboard? Bad memory? Should I give up my job as an engineering executive and go back to playing with Legos because I can't even build a PC? To answer that, let's see how the new machine compares against modern machines. Using the current version of Performance Test (v8.0) yields the following results...

PassMark Rating: 3,227
CPU Mark: 11,114
2D Graphics: 1,120
3D Graphics: 559
Memory Mark: 2,961
Disk Mark: 4,266

These numbers are solid. In fact, with the exception of the 3D Graphics, this machine outperforms the other 71 i7-4770 based systems on cpubenchmark.net as of this writing. And the i7-4770 is arguably the fastest stock chip you can get for under 580USD. This makes the lack of progress over the past 10 years even more clear.

My take is:

Unless you have to have a new desktop now, you really should sit this round out altogether - Intel did. The lack of TSX support on the K-series takes them out of play. I am doubtful of the real world improvements of the Ivy Bridge-e as well. If you have a Sandy Bridge, or a Sandy Bridge-e - in my opinion you built at the right time. We have two 2600K based machines and they will serve in their roles well for many years. My plan for my personal desktop is to take a good look at the Haswell-e chips after the prices stabilize (along with DDR4) - maybe sometime in 2015. If I like what I see, the i7-4770 will be transitioned to our HTPC and I will build a new desktop then. That will give me 2 years with this hardware on my desk - about 1/5 of what I got out of my last desktop build.

40 of 45 people found the following review helpful.
4Solid Processor, Modest jump from Gen 3, Not for overclocking
By Amadeus B. Klein
This is Intel's 4th Generation i7, the 4770 is a direct replacement of the 3770. This CPU is not meant for overclocking (does not have an unlocked multiplier), you want the Intel Core i7-4770K Quad-Core Desktop Processor BX80646I74770K for that.

That said you will need a new motherboard to upgrade from any of the earlier generation CPUs as this generation uses the 1150 socket while the other 3 used different ones. One nice thing here is aftermarket CPU coolers that fit 1155/1156 sockets will work on this CPU.

This CPU is a Quad Core, 8 thread running at 3.4GHz with boost to 3.9GHz as needed.
It is an 84 Watt CPU. The only currently available faster Intel 4th Gen CPU is the 4770K running at 3.5Ghz (and able to be overclocked thanks to the unlocked multiplier).

It comes with HD 4600 integrated graphics which is an upgrade over the HD 4000 in the 3rd Generation 3770.

Depending on what site you read for technical reviews this processor will give an improvement of 1%-20% over a 3rd generation CPU. Personally it seems about a 5%-10% increase in performance in most bench tests I have seen...

When looking at this consider some of the following things:
1) This will require a new motherboard ($100+)so budget that in
2) This does not have an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is out.
3) With a $300+ price tag and a minimum $100 for a motherboard you will be spending at least $400+ to upgrade so even assuming the best performance increase that's $20 per % of increased performance.

If the price fits what you are looking for and you have no desire to overclock then this might be a solid choice of CPU...

I personally decided on the i7-4770K because if I ever choose to I can overclock it. I upgraded from a 3770K (not overclocked) and didn't really see any real world performance increase (Not overclocked).

I am using it in my media center PC which serves 6-8 TVs, streams music and maintains my media collection. so I am not pushing it with extreme gaming, but I do have it running without a hitch while streaming 1080p 3D movies to 6 TVs at the same time...

If you absolutely must have a 4th Gen i7 Processor and price is a major concern then this might be a good fit, but if top performance is more what you're looking for go with the 4770K... The performance bump over the 1st/2nd gen CPUs does seem worth the price.

If you are happy with your 3rd Gen i7 I would skip the upgrade since it's not that large of a performance boost overall...

Components in my personal Build:
Silverstone Tek GD-08 Case
ASUS Z87-PRO Intel Z87 4DIMM ATX
Corsair Enthusiast Series TX850 V2 850W 80+ Bronze
SAMSUNG 840 250GB 2.5 SATA III
Intel Core i7-4770K 3.50 GHz LGA1150
Kingston XMP 16GB 1866MHz DDR3 CL9 (Kit of 4) XMP
Blu-ray Optical Drive
5 Western Digital Red 3 TB NAS Hard Drive: 3.5 Inch, SATA III (12TB Usable with Raid Config)
ARCTIC Freezer 7 Pro Rev. 2, CPU Cooler
EVGA GeForce GTX 650 1024MB GDDR5 DVI mHDMI Graphics Card

Just my Thoughts,

MG

28 of 32 people found the following review helpful.
5A better deal than the i7-4770K
By coder
This processor is fully featured, unlike the i7-4770K which lacks support for TSX and costs more. The TSX instruction set extension will make multi-threaded applications faster, so despite the i7-4770K's extra overclocking abilities (which are not guaranteed), it may not be the faster processor in all cases.

So just get this i7-4770 instead and get what you pay for. You can also save money on a cheaper motherboard. This processor offers a lot of bang for the buck and still has untapped potential thanks to the AVX2 and TSX features which will be used by future software and thus extend its longevity.

I've observed a fairly consistent 20% higher performance in multi-threaded applications over an i7-2600 so far. AVX2's doubled vector processing power should increase that gap even more once multimedia applications and games make use of it.

See all 61 customer reviews...More...


Dell XPS Desktop (X8700-1259BLK)

Dell XPS Desktop (X8700-1259BLK)..


Dell XPS Desktop (X8700-1259BLK)

Special Price Dell XPS Desktop (X8700-1259BLK) By Dell

Most helpful customer reviews

17 of 18 people found the following review helpful.
5Great computer
By Douglas
I bought my wife an i5 version of this computer and liked it so much I bought this one for myself. I haven't gotten it completely configured yet, but so far I am very impressed. Based upon what I have seen so far this is what I have found.

Pro
Very fast
Minimal trial software
Space and power connections for 3 more hard drives
Video card more than adequate for all but high end games
Comes with Windows 8.1 rather than 8
Open slots for two more sticks of ram
Built in wifi (No problems with connectivity)

Con
Keyboard is very basic and wired
Mouse is wired
Power supply probably not enough for video card upgrade
No additional pci slots for second video card
At this price point a small ssd for the OS would have been nice

Overall, unless you are wanted to load up on high-end graphics, this computer will more than fulfill your needs. I added a Samsung 250gb ssd as a boot drive, as well as an additional 2tb mechanical drive, and everything runs perfectly. It required a total of 25 minutes to clone the original boot drive to the ssd, so that is a very easy upgrade. I highly recommend this computer.

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
5Smooth, Fast, Nice Upgrade
By Chris J Wagner
Upgraded from a dual core to this i7. Also a move from 32 bit to 64 provides increased RAM availability.

I did customize my experience with this machine out of personal preference. I loaded a 256GB Samsung SSD (also bought on Amazon with an Icy Dock) in place of the included 1TB drive. I'll be using that drive for extra storage. There are many SATA ports, so adding an extra drive is no big deal. (I had an extra SATA cable laying around, too. Bonus me.)

In my customized experience, I also loaded Windows 7 professional. As of this post, there are 64 bit drivers for Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 on Dell's website. I had to change from UEFI to legacy in bios for Win7 to boot normally. I believe UEFI should have worked, but it didn't. No biggie.

I'll be curious how some of my older games and QuickBooks will work on this machine in 64 bit, but that has no bearing on the box itself.

One thing I will say... working extensively with Dell's OptiPlex line, you miss the quick release to get inside the tower and also the removable drive bays. With only few exceptions, those things are completely tool-less. No big deal at all, just an observation.

I'm on Windows update 70 of 104... haha... but so far the machine is very responsive and a noticeable difference over the previous dual core machine.

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
3Boot failures until a BIOS setting is changed
By W. Warren
It's not a good sign when a brand new computer fails to boot the first time it's turned on. The first image from this computer was an error message "Media Test Failure, check cable". After a couple of hours of troubleshooting, opening the case and checking cables, and finally calling Dell Support, a technician identified the problem. The computer was set to boot in "Legacy" mode instead of "UEFI" mode as required for Windows 8. If you follow instructions at Dell online and reset the BIOS to factory defaults, it will go back to Legacy and fail to boot again. Once I made the proper change in the BIOS to boot via UEFI, it booted fine and seems to be running OK. If this happened to mine, I bet there are at least 19 others (that's how many were available when I ordered) are also affected.
[Edit: I was going to add a picture of the screen, but it seems I can't. The full error message also had "Reboot and Select proper Boot device or Insert Boot Media in selected Boot device and press a key."]

See all 8 customer reviews...More...


Senin, 29 Juni 2015

ASUS M11AA-US002Q Intel Core i3-3220T, 4GB RAM, 1TB HD, Desktop with Windows 7 Professional

ASUS M11AA-US002Q Intel Core i3-3220T, 4GB RAM, 1TB HD, Desktop with Windows 7 Professional..


ASUS M11AA-US002Q Intel Core i3-3220T, 4GB RAM, 1TB HD, Desktop with Windows 7 Professional

Grab Now ASUS M11AA-US002Q Intel Core i3-3220T, 4GB RAM, 1TB HD, Desktop with Windows 7 Professional By Asus

Most helpful customer reviews

26 of 27 people found the following review helpful.
5Excellant computer
By Sharon A Thomas
I am very satisfied with this processor. It meets all of my needs, especially having a Windows 7 operating system similar to XP like I'm used to instead of Windows 8 which I can't get used to at all. I just didn't realize that it came with a keyboard and mouse and I had ordered another set. I like the compact size with easily accessible usb ports but the black keyboard is a little hard for me to see the letters or numbers. Overall I love it though paired with a nice 21 inch flat screen with excellant digital display.

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
5I am a ASUS Convert
By appaloosa
This ASUS CPU is exactly what I needed to replace my pricey, but out of date Dell that had an Windows XP operating system. It gets the job done and luckily was easy to set up, as I love my armoire desk and needed this shape CPU. Not familiar with the brand except for seeing my grandkids using theirs. Only thing I see as a negative is the cd slot is difficult to access when I have something plugged into the USB ports right above. Luckily my monitor has 2 ports that make this situation better. Changing to Windows 7 has been a learning process, but much easier than I expected. I definitely have very little technological training so appreciate this unit making my life easier, not more difficult. Senior citizens like me do not like change, but I have read enough to know Windows 7 would be a good alternative. and it is!

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful.
4A good Buy !
By Alexander Sloan
This is a good buy for a low end PC. Has sufficient memory and processing power for home, High School and College use. Would not purchase for gaming or business. Does not have wireless

See all 8 customer reviews...More...


Minggu, 19 April 2015

Crucial 4GB Kit (2GBx2) DDR2 (PC2-6400) DIMM 240-Pin Desktop Memory Modules CT2KIT25664AA800

Crucial 4GB Kit (2GBx2) DDR2 (PC2-6400) DIMM 240-Pin Desktop Memory Modules CT2KIT25664AA800..


Crucial 4GB Kit (2GBx2) DDR2 (PC2-6400) DIMM 240-Pin Desktop Memory Modules CT2KIT25664AA800

Buy Crucial 4GB Kit (2GBx2) DDR2 (PC2-6400) DIMM 240-Pin Desktop Memory Modules CT2KIT25664AA800 By Crucial

Most helpful customer reviews

31 of 32 people found the following review helpful.
4Plug 'n Play
By Gregory Law
I've been using Crucial memory in my notebook and desktop computers for years because Crucial memory is very reliable and remains one of the true "plug 'n play" products on the market. I purchased two 4GB kits to expand my desktop computer to 8GB to give me a little more headway to run Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 in a virtual machine on my host running Windows Vista x64.

Although Crucial PC2-6400 DDR2 memory is not the absolute fastest memory available, it is significantly cheaper than the "Extreme" varieties and offers plenty of speed for most demanding applications (image editing, movie editing, software development, etc.). Windows Vista x64 gives this memory a rating of 5.7, which is very near the top of the scale in the current rating system.

15 of 15 people found the following review helpful.
5Well priced, reliable, compatible and fast
By Aaron Grimm
I recently installed the 64 bit version of Windows 7 on my CPU, enabling me to go from 4 gigs of RAM to 8. I researched what memory would work best with my current hardware configuration, and came across Crucial's 4GB memory set. It's solid, easy to install, compatible with everything I have running (which is a sort of Frankenstein configuration), and has sped my computer up considerably. I am quite pleased with this product and feel it's reasonably priced.

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
5Works like Promised
By Ahmed Roberson
This item works perfectly in my HP PC. I bought two sticks previously, and figured I should buy two more for a matching set, and 8-GIGS of RAM....BIG help with my Photoshop Speed!!

Not a single regret!!!

See all 352 customer reviews...More...


Selasa, 14 April 2015

Apple Mac Pro MD878LL/A Desktop

Apple Mac Pro MD878LL/A Desktop..


Apple Mac Pro MD878LL/A Desktop

Grab Now Apple Mac Pro MD878LL/A Desktop By Apple

Most helpful customer reviews

47 of 50 people found the following review helpful.
5The 6 Core - D500 model is the "Goldilocks" of the Mac Pro Line... "Just Right"
By Joe Crescenzi
While most of the buyers of the Mac Pro line will be looking for a custom configuration, the 6 Core model with dual D500 GPUs will likely be the one that has the best mix of price and performance.

If you are unfamiliar with the new Mac Pro line, there are quite a few combinations of options that can produce a range of prices from $2999 to nearly $10,000.

Currently there are only TWO "Stock" configurations:

$2999 gets you a Quad Core Xeon with dual D300 GPUs, 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of Solid State Storage

$3999 gets you a Six Core Xeon with dual D500 GPUs , 16 GB of RAM and the same 256 GB of Solid State Storage. This is truly the "Goldilocks" configuration... the middle of the road.

In a custom configuration, which you can only get directly from Apple (which takes time), each of those components can be upgraded, however only some can be "User Upgraded", so you must be aware of that when you buy, because you will not likely change them later.

Here are the things you CAN upgrade AFTER you purchase:

1. RAM - You can upgrade the RAM on all models, from 12 GB all the way to 64. There are 4 card slots, however you can't mix chip sizes. So, if you buy the 12 GB model, it uses 3 cards of 4 GB each leaving 1 slot open, so you can upgrade it to 16 by adding one more card. If you want to increase it beyond that, you will be removing all of the 4GB cards, and replacing them with 8's or 16's.

This means that the 16 GB model comes with 4 x 4 GB cards, so any increase in that configuration will involve getting rid of all 4 of the 4 GB cards and starting with 8's or 16s. I think it's a shame Apple doesn't start with 2 x 8GB cards, so you could keep your existing memory and add two more... or even better, if it had 1 x 16GB card, so you could add up to 3 more.

Anyhow, with this base model, if you want to upgrade to 32 or 64 later, just be prepared to toss out the old.

2. The Solid State Drive is upgradable too, however since this is new technology, it's not easy to find them right now. My guess is in a year or two, there will be plenty of third party SSDs out there. In particular OWC has already committed to making a line of Mac Pro friendly storage.

3. The CPU... oddly IS upgradable, however you will not likely change this for a long time, because the Xeon chips in these models are super expensive. The top of the line 12 core that fits this socket costs well over $3000. In either case, it's nice to know you can. So in a year or two, you may be able to double your CPU cores for $1000 or less as chip prices drop.

Among things you CAN'T change (easily).

1. The Dual GPUs. The GPUs in this model technically are not soldered in, so although upgrades are potentially possible, I don't think there will be any third party upgrades on the horizon. So, if you think you need ultra-high end 3D rendering or GPU intensive power for image processing or CAD, get the GPU card you want from the start. You won't be able to change it.

They don't have a "Stock" configuration with the top of the line GPUs, which are the D700s, but the "Goldilocks" configuration has the D500s, which are right in the middle, and they are super powerful. Years ago, that kind of horsepower could only be found in a super computer.

Although some people consider the Mac Pro to be expensive, the reality is the GPUs alone are based upon existing cards which actually cost just as much as the entire computer. These are not the run of the mill graphic cards you would find in a typical gaming computer. These are world class workstation grade powerhouses and they are NOT cheap.

Who should consider the low end package?

Anyone who would've considered the iMac or the Mac Mini, but wanted something more upgradable. Right now, those other models do not have anywhere near the expansion capabilities of this model. At best, you can upgrade the RAM in the Mini to 16, and the iMac to 32, the rest are literally locked in and not accessible, much less upgradable.

Also, the iMac and Mac Mini do not have Thunderbolt 2, which is the next generation in high speed expansion. Thunderbolt 2 is twice the speed of the prior generation and it is capable of speeds of up to 20 Gb/s, which is not only 4 times faster than USB 3.0, but it is also a direct path to the motherboard itself. Unlike USB which is just a communication protocol, Thunderbolt is actually more like the internal card bus in traditional PCs, except it's self contained in a cabling system. In fact, there are actually products made today that take the Thunderbolt bus, and give you traditional card slots, so in a sense, it's even more expandable than the older tower configuration.

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful.
5New Mac Pro
By Geek guy
Well thought I would write a review of this beast of a workstation. Note I bought from another another site to save on taxes.

I have a 2008 Mac Pro and felt it was time to upgrade to the latest model. I use the Mac Pro for everything from 3D art to work and some gaming and normal web and email.

For work I use the MS RDP client app to connect to the Microsoft world via Gateway and works perfectly.

Also I have three 55inch TVs that I connect to the Mac Pro and in this case is where the Mac Pro had issues. Connecting the TVs you need to have a Active dongle to make the third TV function. In the older Pro 2008 I added another video Card and had no issues, In this case you will rack your brain trying to find the answer. Oh and do not go to the Apple Geniuses for this as they have no clue nor does apple sell the Active dongle. Third party.

But other then the dongle issue its been flawless. A normal render of my 3D art on the old Mac was about 15min to complete at the highest level. The new Mac Pro less then a min big difference in my world.

Current game is Elder Scrolls online and they support both Windows and Mac OSX and works flawlessly as well.

The old Mac Pro has a lot of fans and you can hear it. Its was not as loud as normal Window workstation but still.. The new Mac Pro can not even tell if it is on. Even under load still can not hear it.

I have heard people trying to build a a system that is equal to the New Mac Pro then Hackintosh it.. I did this a five years ago and it worked but was not worth the time and money spent.

Been using Apple hardware for the last 10 years and everything that I have bought from Apple still works today.. Even that first Mac Mini. Yea the cost is much higher but the quality is much better. I also have used Vm-ware for Windows VM’s but I have not used it on the new Pro as I try to stay away from the windows world. I might have to support Windows OS for work but do not use it for my personal stuff.

If you are on the fence because of the price I understand I was too, but so far it is worth every dollar and the OSX is a much better OS then Windows ever could be.

Will be upgrading the memory very soon to the 64Gigs and max the system out. Note on memory I noticed this in all of my Macs that Run Maverick. I found that the Apps do not release the memory so like in my Macbook Pro 17 with 8gig I would run out after using several apps. Got a memory manager on the App store for 99 cents and fixed the issue. So its a OSX issue not a hardware problem.

Oh one more kind of issue for me was the plugs that hang off the new Mac Pro since they are in a tight area there are a ton of cables coming out the pro.. So cable management is differently needed here.

Overall I’m very pleased and will keep the five star because even with the Monitor issue and the little things mentioned. The New Mac Pro is the king of workstations and the size amazes me. Its no taller then my IPAD so extremely small and a ton of power.

9 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
5A dream that is shaped like a can.
By Joshua Glowzinski
A few things before my review. First, I have had 5 computers in my 29 years of life. The first was a DOS system my godfather gave me. Then an HP with Windows 98 my grandparents got me. Then I got three more over the next decade or so. All but the DOS one had Windows. So, I am no expert of Macs or the OS that is on it. I read the Steve Jobs bio and decided to switch to Mac. I save my money for a little over two years. I was going to get the best last gen Mac Pro I could. After I saw the new one was coming out, I realized I would have enough to get the best one of the new generation. So I pre ordered. I got an email saying it would arrive from the 10th of March to the 12th. I got it on the 6th!

Now for the review. But first, a good laugh. When I first got the thing, I had no clue how the hell to turn it on. It took me 15 minutes to figure it out. Haha I actually almost broke the thing. I had it in the air. I hit a button and it was the button that unlocks the shell. If it had not been for the cables hooked into it, the entire computer would have fallen out onto my floor. I would have just looked and cried. Haha
Ok, so the tower itself feels solid. It is a good weight. The outside gets really cool. When I go to turn it on in the morning, it almost feels like it has been sitting outside. The power button is on the bottom left side of the back. When I first turned it on, I heard a sound. It came from the tower. I looked at my monitors and the freaking thing was on. It actually comes on faster than my iPad 3. I just sat here and stared at it. My PC I had been suing took like two minutes to come on.

After setting everything up, it was time to play. It is amazing. Nothing freezes or pops up randomly. No screen full of software that I've no need for. Just a simple clean look. The icons on the bottom tray are a nice thing. Instead of filling up my desktop with a thousand icons, they are nice and clean on the bottom. I did put a few things on my desktop, but I had the choice. Even for me, who has never really used Mac, though I do have a laptop, I never use it. I got it randomly one day, everything is easy to figure out. I LOVE the setup and look of the software. It actually almost reminds me of my iPad. Say you open your email. Well, unless you close it, you can mineralize it and when you get a new email, it pops up on the top right of your screen. The same thing happens when someone replies to something I write on facebook. Very cool. Everything is right there when you need it.

I have two monitors. One is a Cintiq 21 UX. I was worried it would not work. It is important to me because I am writing a series of kids books. I use it all the time. Well, I got two DVI to Thunderbolt two cables and they work fine. I was mad at first. The Cintiq, while working fine as a monitor, would not let me write on it. I realized that stupid me did not have the USB cable hooked in. haha But the monitors work great. The main software that I used in windows works with this OS. For that which does not, I got a program called Paralles. I had Windows 8 sitting here and installed it. Worked great.

The one thing that bothered me was the available storage. I got the most I could and it is 1tb. That is more than enough for some. Not for me though. I have almost 12,000 songs on my computer. Thousands of TV shows, hundreds of movies and books and thousands of Apps. The art I do takes up a good amount of space. I save it in Photoshop format as well as jpeg. I also do a lot of video stuff as well as music and some Flash. But, I found the solution. Western Digital. I found something called a My Cloud EX 4. It is a 12 tb external drive of sorts. Hooked it up and it worked right away. I've not even done anything with the Mac yet. I am just putting stuff onto that drive from Blu-Rays. But that was the only problem. Well, that and I could not get my TV tuner to work. But, I found the solution to that and got one from eBay.

As far as programs go, never have I had a system that loads things as fast as this. I mean, I click it and it opens right away. There is no wait time. I can have 10 things going at once and everything is just flowing like water through a stream. It is an amazing thing to see.

The Mac stays so quite. I cannot even hear it now and it is just below me. I had it one for hours and hours over the past few days and while it may feel a little warm, it never gets hot. It is just incredible.
What I now have is the fastest, most well balanced system I have ever had. It does what I need it to without problem. It is easy to set up and once you are all through with the set up, you can sit back and just look at the cool, relaxed look that the OS is. For anyone who has ever liked Apple, or for those who want to give it a try, this is the best system I've ever owned. It makes me mad only for the fact that it took me so long to give Mac a change.

Just a quick update.
I was transferring stuff from blu ray, to my Mad, then to my My Cloud EX 4. I had pictures. 17.5 gigs. I started at like 8pm. My Mac Pro had been on since about 5pm. It did not finish until 11 something in the morning. My Mac Pro did not feel hot. After being on for such a long time. Good to know.

See all 9 customer reviews...More...


Kamis, 09 April 2015

Seagate Desktop 1 TB Solid State Hybrid Drive SATA 6 GB with NCQ 64 MB Cache 3.5 Inch (ST1000DX001)

Seagate Desktop 1 TB Solid State Hybrid Drive SATA 6 GB with NCQ 64 MB Cache 3.5 Inch (ST1000DX001)..


Seagate Desktop 1 TB Solid State Hybrid Drive SATA 6 GB with NCQ 64 MB Cache 3.5 Inch (ST1000DX001)

Buy Seagate Desktop 1 TB Solid State Hybrid Drive SATA 6 GB with NCQ 64 MB Cache 3.5 Inch (ST1000DX001) By Seagate

Most helpful customer reviews

96 of 105 people found the following review helpful.
5Good compromise between speed and price.
By RJMacReady
Watch Video Here: http://www.amazon.com/review/R2Z1X7ISIZY61A I've been using an SSD as a boot drive on my Windows desktop so I can speak from experience when I say that this drive doesn't really come close to it when it comes to speed. Both are much faster than a standard drive, so the difference is only a matter of seconds, though. And the solid state drive cost nearly as much as this drive but has a fraction of the storage, only enough to hold my operating system and a few of my most frequently used programs. Everything else has to run off a second drive. This drive doesn't cost all that much more than a standard drive for the same storage, and still offers a nice boost in speed.

It works differently than a boot drive, as the computer does not recognize the solid state memory as a second drive, so you don't select which programs or files run off the drive. It only has 8GBs of solid state memory, so it couldn't even hold the operating system. Instead, the drive decides which files to store on the SSD, based on which of them are used most frequently. For that reason, the performance of the drive improves over time, as the drive learns and optimizes how it uses the limited solid state memory.

So far, I'm pleased with the drive. I really haven't noticed any differences between this one and disk based drives I've used, other than an increase in speed. It doesn't complicate things at all - the computer sees it as just another single drive. Having 2TB is nice, as I don't have to worry about space, even with a large collection of HD movies and games stored. Installing it wasn't any more difficult than other drives I've used either. If speed is your top priority, than there is no substitute for an SSD right now, but this is a nice compromise between speed and storage size at a decent price, if you're not worried about your computer taking a few more seconds to boot up.

I've included a short video so you can actually see my PC doing a complete restart. It's pretty fast, but the SSD was even faster.

45 of 51 people found the following review helpful.
5What your iMac needs
By R dattan
Have a mid 2011 iMac with a 3Gbps SATA -500 GB that was running out of space. Plus was getting colored wheels more often inspite of 12GB RAM. SSD at 1TB was half the price of the iMAC which made no sense and the smaller capacity SSD's were ruled out- so this is where the Seagate SSHD 1TB comes in with the right value. The drive is pretty fast and I'm into this for a week only, hence the 4 stars. Amazon's shipping was fast, though the box was not the original Seagate one. Seems like some packaging cost was reduced. Performance wise, the machine feels like a new iMAC straight out of an Apple Store!. Getting this into an iMAC is harder than changing out an MBP HDD and also much harder than a desktop PC. But all said, it is quite doable. Here are the steps- I won't go into too much detail to keep things simple, just follow the links. There may be some differences depending on your iMAC model from 2011, but expect the basic steps to be more or less the same.
Step 1)
Move new SSHD into a USB enclosure. Use clonezilla ([...] to do a disk to disk back up.

Step 2)
As a clone, the new SSHD disk is partitioned exactly like the old disk- which means 500GB is left out- Use Disk Utility to expand the SSHD into 1TB.

Step 3)
Follow this Youtube link to see how to add a new disk to the iMac. You will need the suction for the glass( I used 2 old car GPS holder suction cups to do the job) and Torx T8 drivers ( Home Depot or Lowes). You need to stop at the part where the display and cables come off fully- everything that follows is not required if you are simply swapping out your current disk with a new SSHD
[...]

Step 4)
In the top- middle section you will find the HDD attached with 2 screws. Take off those screws and the 2 cables that connect the HDD. At the bottom, you will find 2 screws sticking out -these are used to hold the HDD to the frame- Use the Torx driver to take them off. Put them back on into the new SSHD. Plug the cables into the new SSHD and put the 2 screws back on

Step 5)
Reverse all the steps, starting with each of the cable connectors as showed in the video. Once everything is back on, power up the iMAC

Step 6)
Depending on your model, you may run into an issue, where the thermal sensor for the HDD may not be detected- this results in the fan running off course and eventually going for full speed ( normal is 1100 rpm- full - 6000 rpm+). This is loud enough and if left running may meltdown the HDD fan. This problem could be fixed with Apple's SMC reset procedure ([...] Use SMC fan control freeware to check fan speeds ([...]

Step 7)
After following Apple's process, if you still observe high fan speeds buy the HDD Fan control app to fix the problem ( there is a 1 hr fully functioning demo, so that you can see it working ([...] At $35 it is a bit pricey but worth it- set it to startup at login, and set it to start in every user's login and you are good to go.

That's it. Seagate drives are generally good and I think this guy will last. I have a momentus 750G SSHD running on the MBP for the last 1 year with no issues. Anyways no more colored wheels spinning and that makes a huge difference

Nov 13th- Update
-------------------------------------------
- Well over a month now- Drive runs well and is quiet -raising my 4 to 5 stars

33 of 40 people found the following review helpful.
5Decent upgrade from 3 year old Barracuda 7200.11
By Timothy D. Williams
I purchased this drive after having great experience with the Momentus XT 500GB (first-gen) notebook SSHD over the last two years. The drive made a great improvement in boot, hibernation and application performance in my Lenovo Thinkpad X120e when an SSD at 500GB capacity would have cost nearly 10x as much as the 500GB SSHD in 2011. I decided to "preorder" this drive over a month ago and it arrived exactly when Amazon promised (late September.)

Upon opening the drive, it looks like a normal hard drive. I mounted it below my original drive that would eventually be pulled, and temporarily plugged it in to the SATA and power cable that my DVD-ROM drive was connected too. I decided to load Seagate's free data migration software (Acronis) which is used by many other OEM's such as Intel for their SSD's. Acronis software has always worked great for me in the past as isn't based on Linux (it appears to be Windows PE) like many "cheaper" migration tools that are often unable to copy Windows GPT partitions or hidden recovery partitions. Acronis data migration in my experience also supports most USB 3.0 and eSATA controllers if you are using an external means to migrate data (such as in a laptop.) I tested it's compatibility with my Texas Instruments USB 3.0 controller and my Marvell eSATA controller and both detected properly, enabling faster copying than over USB 2.0 in a laptop. In short, Seagate's migration software is excellent.

The migration of 1TB data took about 2.5 hours using internal SATA 3Gbps. After it was finished, I disconnected the old drive, connected the SSHD, and plugged my my optical drive back in.

Windows booted and everything looked fine. Performance wasn't much faster at first, but over the course of a few days there have been noticeable improvements booting Windows, loading iTunes and Chrome, and especially switching user accounts. The performance isn't dramatic, but it's there. Windows 7 performance index went from 5.9 to 7.4. This is an Intel x58 motherboard with a 3Gbps (SATA 2.0, 300MB/sec) controller. Newer systems may have a higher rating, but from what I've read, the single 8GB NAND chip on the Seagate SSHD's is only 2-channel so it's limited to around 190MB/sec. The goal is to offer improved random access performance like an SSD, which it does.

Regarding the "product review" I've been running the drive exactly one week pretty heavily with no issues, so at least my model doesn't appear to be defective. Packaging for shipment was excellent; it arrived in a real hard drive carrier with plastic cradles at each end. SMART diagnostics tools has found no problems. Drive had 2 spin ups and 1 hours of use (all presumably factory final testing.)

Hope this review helps with your decision. It's unfortunate they don't make a 3TB and 4TB model.

See all 229 customer reviews...More...


Kamis, 02 April 2015

Apple iMac ME087LL/A 21.5-Inch Desktop (NEWEST VERSION)

Apple iMac ME087LL/A 21.5-Inch Desktop (NEWEST VERSION)..


Apple iMac ME087LL/A 21.5-Inch Desktop (NEWEST VERSION)

GET Apple iMac ME087LL/A 21.5-Inch Desktop (NEWEST VERSION) By Apple

Most helpful customer reviews

89 of 99 people found the following review helpful.
5Apple vs PC? No comparison - the Mac wins
By ShoePurseBookBuyer
I have just switched back to a Mac after years of using a PC. The difference is night and day. The Mac is so much easier to use (although it took me a short while to get the hang of it), and has many more options and abilities. I am an artist, so I had to switch all my art files from PC to the Mac. It was easy to do and the Mac is so much more art friendly. I have to write quite a lot of documents, so I needed the Mac to handle that too, and it does.
I happen to own an iPhone and iPad Air as well. My son set my iPad Air (he's more tech savvy than me) to show and act as my Mac's desktop. So when I am away from my Mac, I can use the iPad as my computer and work with it as if I had a mini desktop! All in all I wouldn't go back to PC if you paid me. I love it.

33 of 34 people found the following review helpful.
5Very Pleased
By Mike
I doubt that I'll ever go back to Windows again (other than the machine that I use at work). This is something that I've wanted to do for a while but I didn't want to take the time to learn it. I finaly bit the bullet and did it. I ordered it on a Saturday and it arrived on the following Wednesday (free shipping).

Within a few days, I'd figured out most of what I care about. I bought a book but found it only marginally helpful. In the several days bewteen ordering it and the arrival, I watched tons of YouTube videos on the iMac and that's where I learned most of what I know so far. Note: FINDER is to the iMac what Windows Explorer is to a PC.

I keep all personal files on an exernal drive, the only thing on the internal drive is the OS, applications, etc. That's a holdover from my Windows days.

Music is loaded although I don't like iTunes so I downloaded WinAmp. Pictures are loaded including some old photos that I've scanned, retouched and then saved back to disc (not just in iPhoto). It has a fairly decent photo editor;basic but good for someone like me who doesn't have the patience for spending 2 hours fixing a picure. Disc formatting and partitioning is quick and easy. I downloaded SuperDuper (free) and created an image in one of the partitions of an external drive. I'm used to using things like Ghost and Acronis on Windows platforms so this SuperDuper image is comforting.

It goes to sleep and remembers how to wake up. I don't think I ever owned a Windows machine that could handle that through several sleep/wake cycles, they always seem to get confused and need a forced shutdown. I attached a watt meter to it and it uses about 40 watts when awake and about 2-3 watts when asleep. The battery in the keyboard is still at 100% but the batterry in the mouse is at about 90% after 10 days. That's understandable considering how much more the mouse is used. A wired mouse would fix that but I like not seeing wires anyplace.

It's incredibly quiet and I'm very sensitive to PC noise.

I bought MS office because it's so much easier (for me) than using what the iMac came with or things like OpenOffice. The interface is not identical to the Windows version; it's close but not identical - don't know why Miscrosoft couldn't have done a better job of that.

It comes with some parameteers set in 10.9 Mavericks that didn't make sense and I thought I was stuck with them until I figured out that they could be changed. The 2 that come to mind are (1) the vertcal scroll bar is not always visible on a web page and (2) a right click on the mouse is not active. I changed both of those things.

I was able to play with the 27 inch version at a local library and found the sceeen too big. Maybe I would have gotten used to it but the 21.5 inch version that I got seems just right.

53 of 62 people found the following review helpful.
3Base model not so good, get the maxed out version!
By Ryan D
So had a base model 2012 21.5 inch iMac. I almost loved it--but I found it was a little too prone to stuttering and choppiness with clicking and scrolling. Also I found the 102 ppi screen surprisingly fuzzy looking.

So I made a decision I thought I might regret--but don't. I ordered a maxed out version of the 2013 model: i7 processor, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB solid state drive, and NVIDIA 750M graphics. Big difference. It's much faster and smoother. Also, to my pleasant surprise, the screen is far less pixellated even though it's the exact same resolution. I assume it's the better graphics card?

I would say splurge for an upgraded customized version--at least you can get the top specs for cheaper than a similar 27 inch iMac--and save yourself from neck strain in the process.

See all 102 customer reviews...More...


Sabtu, 28 Maret 2015

Dell Inspiron Desktop (i3847-4616BK)

Dell Inspiron Desktop (i3847-4616BK)..


Dell Inspiron Desktop (i3847-4616BK)

Special Price Dell Inspiron Desktop (i3847-4616BK) By Dell

Most helpful customer reviews

61 of 63 people found the following review helpful.
5Great high end computer at a low end price!
By D. Safir
I waited a bit to write this review, as I wanted to test the computer out. I got it as a gift for my girlfriend, so I only get to use it on the weekends. I was shopping for an i3 computer for her and was pleasantly surprised to find this i5 computer for the same price as an i3. I got it for $449 and it's only gone up a little to $479 (I believe). Great price. It was easy to set up and runs fast and quiet. I was pleased to find that, although it said it came with Windows 8, it actually came with 8.1, which allows you to convert this to practically a Windows 7 style computer, for those who don't want to use the tiles. Since this is a desktop computer, I'm assuming that most of you want the classic style and not the tablet style. It's very easy to do by using the following article I got from an IT friend. To find it, just Google "ITPro Windows 8.1 Tips and Tricks". Use the tips in this article and, bingo, you have a Windows 7 computer.

If you're using a different virus software than the McAfee that comes with this, make sure to uninstall McAfee and install your program of choice (I had an open slot for Norton Internet Security so I just went to the website and downloaded it from my account to this computer). Then I went to see if there were necessary updates. There were none to install. If you want to use Microsoft Office 365 trial version that comes with this computer, fine. Just follow the instructions to activate it. That is an online version of office and you pay about $100 a year, so we didn't want that. I purchased Office 2013 Home and Business (as my girlfriend uses Outlook) and installed it with the key code I got. You have to make sure to uninstall the trial Office 365, first, or it will not work, as it will think the key code is for the trial Office 365 and not the one you are installing. There was no problem with the monitor, keyboard or mouse I connected, even though they were old models. It recognized them automatically. I did the printer last, as I wanted the full HP Solution Center, so I went to HP online and downloaded the complete package, plugging in the printer at the prompt.

Everything went smoothly. Using the tips from the link I gave you, I set it up to boot to the desktop and not the tiles. Then I went to the store (which is in the tiles view) and got a free classic Start button that works just like the Windows 7 Start button (in desktop view, there is no Start button until you get one from the Store). Then I got my libraries back, as the article tells you to. For you XP users, the libraries is simply the Windows 7 version of My Documents, except that it has its own folder-looking icon in the lower left of your taskbar, and separates My Pictures, My Music and Documents into separate libraries. Once you get used to it, you actually like this separation better. Also, be aware that if you use Outlook, once you install it and import your Outlook.pst file from your backup, it automatically stores your root Outlook pst file in the Documents section, so you never have to back it up on your computer. Just back up your documents onto an external drive and Outlook is automatically backed up. Set your default programs to be the programs in the classic desktop version, which are different programs from the tiles view (Windows Media Player, Photo Gallery, etc.) so when you click on a file it doesn't switch you to the tiles view. Do the other few hints in the article and you're all set to go. You basically have a Windows 7 computer. It works great.

As it doesn't come with a terrific graphics card, just a sufficient one for the average user, I wouldn't recommend this computer to a heavy gamer. A heavy gamer should probably get an i7 with a 1 Gig dedicated NVidia or AMD graphics card. Otherwise this is a great computer for just about anybody, even heavy multi-taskers. Go for it while the price is still so good. And look at the comments to Techie 1. One person has a link to whatever documentation you need - diagram with specs, user's manual and quick startup guide. Get this computer and have fun!!! Oh, one little thing - the USB3 ports are in the back, a bit of an annoyance if you have a USB3 backup drive and back it up every week. There are 2 USB2 ports in the front which we use, so for us that's not an issue - and it backs up fast, even with USB2.

New comment: It's over 2 months, now, and still no problems with this computer. Still running great. Although it's up to $549 this week, it was $499 last week, so keep watching the price. $549 is still not a bad price. Remember, it's easy to make it run like a Windows 7 computer. You don't have to pay extra for a Windows 7 computer. Oh, I forgot to mention that, although it comes with a CD/DVD burner, I didn't see the burning software in the desktop programs. So I simply went to the store in the tiles view and downloaded a free one. You can always get to the tiles view by clicking on the Windows icon in the lower left of the taskbar. You can get back to your desktop view by clicking on the tile that says desktop. It's easy to go back and forth from one to the other.

Additional Comment: I see from other reviews, and from researching on the Internet that there is another way to restore the classic view. You can download Classic Shell. This seems to do what my steps do, but in one download. It seems to add some nice features, but I've seen some complaints from people that they can't get rid of the "charms" sidebar. The main advantage, it seems to me, are some customizable features, which my steps don't add, mostly to a customizable Windows Explorer. I don't really know if this download is so much better than the steps I have given you, but it seems you have more than one way to make this into a classic view computer.

30 of 30 people found the following review helpful.
5Plug in and Play
By W. Randall
I was able to pull this from the box, set it up, and be online checking email and doing all of my basic web surfing within an hour or so.

I had to scratch my head a couple of times with Windows 8 having run XP pro for the past several years, but I've encountered no difficulties with it that I couldn't solve with a little experimenting or a quick search.

I'm by no means a techie but was able to transfer all of my documents and music easily with a flash drive.

The speed is everything I'd hoped for and video's play smoothly and reliably.

Very happy with this PC.

Oh, and quiet? This PC is absolutely SILENT.

15 of 15 people found the following review helpful.
5A Great Computer
By Jean E. Dvorak
My Dell came with no instructions, but hooking up all the connections was a simple matter. I do have basic computer knowledge, so that did help. Then, I turned on the power and was instantly delighted. Every single device I'd connected worked perfectly from the first minute. This is, apparently, one of the big benefits of an upgrade to the newer Windows operating systems. My old computer was running Windows XP and I was running into problems more and more often.

Windows 8.1, loaded on the new Dell does take some getting used to. Finding files and programs is, at first, a bit daunting. I had to call Microsoft at one point for some help. The tech there was wonderful and told me I was not the only customer who had to call to figure out the new operating system.

All that aside, my Dell is blazing fast at loading Internet sites, my programs, and any apps I may have added. I'm still learning to work in the Windows 8.1 interface, but my computer itself works like a charm. It has plenty of ports to add accessories and a huge hard drive to handle all the files I may need.

This is a great desktop computer at a great price.

See all 18 customer reviews...More...


Selasa, 24 Maret 2015

Logitech Desktop MK120 Mouse and keyboard Combo

Logitech Desktop MK120 Mouse and keyboard Combo..


Logitech Desktop MK120 Mouse and keyboard Combo

Grab Now Logitech Desktop MK120 Mouse and keyboard Combo By Logitech

Most helpful customer reviews

78 of 81 people found the following review helpful.
5Good Cheap Keyboard mouse combo
By Josef Stephens
Original plan was to purchase a wireless keyboard and mouse combo, after reviews and specs I realized I wasn't a huge fan of any of the options. I reformed my plan to purchase a new keyboard and use an old mouse, well after looking around at various sites I found this combo to be the best.

Keyboard is standard layout and fairly low profile. Feels good to type on and has worked great for gaming so far. Mouse is a standard 2 button and wheel optical mouse works well as well.

Only down side I can see is that the cable seems to be a bit light gauge and may affect the life expectancy of the keyboard or mouse, however if you don't have animals that may eat the cable and if you plan to plug this into an office set up and never remove it I am sure it wont affect its longevity.

37 of 42 people found the following review helpful.
5Great keyboard with no useless fluff
By D@rkFX
Love the keyboard for its classic design. No more useless fluff like copy and paste buttons, playback buttons, browser... email buttons etc.
The keys are at the right size and shape, no more irregular over sized or shrunk keys.

16 of 18 people found the following review helpful.
5Cheap OK Works, but I like it a lot.
By T. Marshall
I've tried many keyboards and mice. I needed a cheap USB combination. This one works but the keyboard is of the cheaper variety. The wires also are of the thinner type I'd think over years not as sturdy if pulled on it.
The length of the cords is good, just their thinness. I've seen this on laptop mice where the wire broke it's connection being pulled too much.
If I had to do it again I would go for Kensington which I think is a definite step up in quality. The mouse also is cheap, the wheel is noisy and rattles.
The reason is that the keyboard and mouse are the main human interface, what you're touching ALL DAY, so why not spend an extra $5.00 for a better quality for something you'll be using every day for years? Alternatively, you do get used to just about any keyboard and mouse that works! Anyway, get this combo for <$20.00. But I'd recommend Kensington. Why has Logitech been making such cheap stuff? Their headphones are also real cheap, quality and price.
UPDATE: Now I like it a lot for the price so I changed my Rating to 5 star. It is easy to use and smooth so I am overlooking the thin cable. The cables are long so that is great.

See all 474 customer reviews...More...