Tampilkan postingan dengan label Graphics. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Graphics. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jumat, 17 Juli 2015

MSI Computer Corp. Video Graphics Card R9 270 GAMING 2G

MSI Computer Corp. Video Graphics Card R9 270 GAMING 2G..


MSI Computer Corp. Video Graphics Card R9 270 GAMING 2G

Buy MSI Computer Corp. Video Graphics Card R9 270 GAMING 2G By MSI Computer Corp.

Most helpful customer reviews

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful.
5Card Overclocks Better Performance then a R9 270X
By KevinW42
This card uses a better cooling fan setup, hence it stays cooler and actually you get more performance from this then the R9 270X with a stock cooler. This card is easy to overclock, you just slide ALL of the sliders to the RIGHT and you get awesome overclock rates. Overclocked this card actually has HIGHER benchmarks in 1080p gaming then the brother R9 270X which cost you up to $20 more. If you're a gamer and like to save money getting BETTER benchmarks, choose this card over the R9 270X card, your Battlefield 4 gaming experience will thank you.

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
5Overclocking Beast
By Cameron
While I'll admit I have several of these cards used for mining I took a day to see what they could do overclocking wise and in game. This card actually overclocks further than most of my 270Xs. I have 4 of these and all of them hit 1130 core/1500 memory completely stable mining 24/7 for over a month now at 481 KH/s each. In games I can get these above 1200 core stable as well. Stock voltage is 1.176V and is unlocked, however I have never needed to up it while my 270Xs have been much more finicky. The main reason I love these cards is the single 6 pin power connector required. Also the old fans these cards used have been fixed and no longer leak oil as frequently as they used to so no more RMAs to worry about. I have 6 270Xs and only 1 of them is able to beat these overclocking and performance wise.

Overall here's what you need to know.

- Single 6 Pin Power
- Easy overclocking
- 480+ KH/s (Gaming performance greater than some 270Xs)
- Fans are silent (Fan problems have been fixed now)
- Unlocked Voltage (1.176V stock)

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
5Beast of a graphics card.
By Sammuel
I upgraded from a GTX 560 and I have to say... this card is a BEAST. I was lagging Battlefield 3 with the GTX 560 but once I switched to this, my FPS was better and everything ran smoother. Radeon is finally doing a good job competing with Nvidia.

See all 15 customer reviews...More...


Jumat, 03 Juli 2015

Gigabyte GTX 770 GDDR5-4GB 2xDVI/HDMI/DP OC WINDFORCE 3X Graphics Card GV-N770OC-4GD

Gigabyte GTX 770 GDDR5-4GB 2xDVI/HDMI/DP OC WINDFORCE 3X Graphics Card GV-N770OC-4GD..


Gigabyte GTX 770 GDDR5-4GB 2xDVI/HDMI/DP OC WINDFORCE 3X Graphics Card GV-N770OC-4GD

Grab Now Gigabyte GTX 770 GDDR5-4GB 2xDVI/HDMI/DP OC WINDFORCE 3X Graphics Card GV-N770OC-4GD By Gigabyte

Most helpful customer reviews

43 of 47 people found the following review helpful.
5Amazing GPU for its cost
By Christopher Whitten
When I was initially planning the purchase of parts to build my new gaming computer, I was adamant about purchasing a GTX 780. After quite a bit of research, I determined that the extra cost was not worth the negligible difference in frames the benchmark reviews were reporting. I have owned this GPU for over a month now, and I do not have any regrets about my decision.

At first glance, the card is nice, and has a comfortable weight when you hold it; almost like you can feel its power (I know, that was very cliche.) There are 3 fans mounted to the card-spanning heatsink, a technology Gigabyte markets as "Windforce." For output, it provides 2 DVI, 1 Display Port, and 1 HDMI. Installing the card was very easy of course; it popped right into the PCI slot with no difficulty.

When I initially got my setup running, I immediately began installing games out of my vast library just for the sake of checking out its performance. I was not disappointed with the results I received, and after the break I will go over some of the more graphically intensive titles such as Skyrim, and Battlefield 3, as well as a brief discussion of the temperatures I've recorded at idle and load.

To establish some reference, I play every game on this setup with a 27" Auria IPS display, with a resolution of 2560x1440 @60hz. The monitor is connected to my 770 via HDMI cable. Note: for those who are under the presumption that HDMI cannot accomplish this res at that refresh rate, the ports on both the GPU and monitor support it, and I have an HDMI cable that does as well (it is a very cheap cable as well.)

As for actual in game performance, this card performs marvelously. In Battlefield 3, at 1920x1080 with all settings maxed I was able to achieve over 100 fps at times according to the in-game counter. When bumping it to 2560x1440, the frame difference was negligible and I was still able to play at comfortable frames and still be competitive.

Part of the reason why I purchased a card with 4GB of VRAM was my interest in modding Skyrim. Just like with Battlefield, the card performed beautifully at 1920x1080 with all settings maxed out while running Bethesda's HD textures add-on in conjunction with a popular user created very high res texture mod. When I cranked it to 2560x1440, I was able to notice frame drops in certain areas, however it was not enough to be a dealbreaker. It is simply a trade I am making to have a higher quality visual experience, without playing on frames that are too low to be acceptable for solid gameplay. One of my gamer friends got to see it in action, and was very impressed by what he saw. For those interested in seeing what it looks like running on this card, I have a variety of screenshots taken in Skyrim that you may view, by searching for user "Eorlas" and navigating to the "Screenshots" section of my Steam profile. (Warning: Some screenshots may contain content spoilers. Please note that Skyrim is an M rated game, and anyone viewing the screenshots should be of legal age to play the game before viewing them.)

As a reference, I will quickly throw in some performance details about other popular games I play should they be of relevance to you: League of Legends runs at solid 60fps at (Stable was selected in settings) without budging at all during gameplay at the aforementioned resolution and maxed settings. Civilization 5 on either single or multiplayer, GTA IV, and Borderlands 2 all perform well set to max at the aforementioned resolution. For other titles or more in depth benchmarks, please research reputable benchmarking sites using Google. There are a bunch of great websites who do highly detailed benchmarks and present the results in well written articles.

Finally, as far as temperature is concerned, I idle at no more than 30 degrees Celsius regularly; at load, I have not seen the card exceed 60 degrees Celsius. My case is entirely air-cooled with 2 front mounted 120mm fans, 1 rear 140mm fan, and 1 top mounted 200mm fan blowing air in.

In conclusion, this card shows amazing performance for a great price point. A 780 at the time of purchase was a touch over $600, and with good deals running at the time I purchased this card for just over $400. You are not "future-proofing" per se by choosing a card with 4GB of VRAM; I would not want to mislead you into believing this card will withstand the test of time (such is not the nature of rapidly advancing technology.) However, if you intend to run multiple games simultaneously, or are interested in heavily modifying games to dramatically change the visual experience (GTA IV, Skyrim as some examples) then a 4GB GPU may not be a bad option for you. The fans and heatsink help to keep it cool, and it runs silently. I cannot attest to its overclocking ability beyond its factory overclock as I have not attempted it yet, however, there are plenty of benchmark sites that have those results readily available.

I highly recommend including this GPU in your comparisons when considering purchasing a new card.

For reference, here are my build specs:

Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H mobo
Intel i7 4770k 3.5Ghz
Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 770 4GB
Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB (8gb) 1600mhz 9-9-9-24
Samsung 840 PRO 256gb SSD(primary)
Seagate barracuda 500gb 5400rpm HDD (data storage)
Western Digital 1gb HDD (data storage)
Samsung 24x DVD drive
Corsair HX750
Coolermaster Storm Trooper

23 of 25 people found the following review helpful.
5Great card for multi-monitor SLI setup
By Brandt
I have two of these cards (2xSLI) in my system and 3 screens setup at 5760x1080 resolution. I got the 4GB version and it was worth it. The 2GB version just wouldn't have enough VRAM for 3 screens. If you are 1920x1080 or less, just get 1 GPU card and get the 2GB version. Much higher than that, get the 4GB version, and if you play the most demanding games in a multi-monitor setup, get two 4GB cards.

My most GPU intensive game is a heavily modified Skyrim (STEP, GEMS, etc) that I play in 3D Surround. Vanilla Skyrim gets 60+ fps even in 3D. My heavily modified Skyrim gets about 54 fps in 2D and 37 fps in 3D. That's pretty good at 5760x1080 resolutions!

Temps at idle are around 35 degrees Celsius, and under FULL load, I max out at about 77 degrees Celsius (max - not average).

As far as noise levels go, even under full load it it very quiet. I can hear it if I'm trying with my ear close to it, but honestly it's not even noticible with background noise. I don't know the exact decible level, but it passes a real world "quiet test."

I have had no issues with SLI problems such as driver issues or game stuttering.

15 of 16 people found the following review helpful.
5Handles Everything, Hopefully a good investment for next-gen quality games
By Ivan Sarafanov
I upgraded from an overclocked GTX 460, with which I could achieve playable framerates on highest settings in all games other than Crysis 3 and parts of Metro: Last Light. I wanted to wait long enough to buy a new graphics card so that I am not compromising visual fidelity in upcoming games, and yet I am not needlessly buying an incrementally better piece of hardware (the same logical I followed when I went from an 8800GT to my 460). This card is more expensive than any that I have had in the past, but the step up in power was significant enough that I decided to buy it. Gigabyte is a very reputable brand, and its no coincidence that it is one of the most popular third party 770's out there because of the balance of build quality and cooler design, factory overclocked tuning, and 4GB of video ram. All of this, combined with the price tag which is considerably smaller than similar EVGA models, are the reasons why so many people such as myself dished out the $450. Obviously its better to buy the 4GB version because it is a fact that multiplatform games designed to take advantage of PS4 architecture will require much more high speed memory. People who say "only get the 4GB variant for multiscreen, high resolution gaming" don't know what they're saying; paying $50 extra for something that will be necessary in the very near future is only logical.

Installation was no problem. The 6-pin connectors I used for my old card had 2 extra pins to the side, making them 8-pin connectors. I did not need to add adapters or change chords in my power supply. The card came with plastic protectors on the portion that goes into the PCI slot, and on the HDMI/DVI inputs. A single screw holds the card firmly in place. Upon booting my computer for the first time with this video card, there were no noises or issues. Windows recognized it, and installed the latest saved driver from Nvidia.

I have been using this 770 for 3 days now with my i5 3570k and 16GB Ram. Battlefield 3 looks spectacular running at 60 fps (something I could not witness up until now). Crysis 3 runs smoothly at the highest settings in 1080p. Some of the most impressive visuals I have been enjoying are in the form of modded GTA IV, with Icenhancer and HD textures (all settings and sliders maxed). I can't wait to play The Witcher 3, Battlefield 4 and Watch Dogs: games that alongside Crysis 3, harness the full potential of this powerful piece of hardware.

The only disappointment I have is that Shadow play, a program which makes use of the Kepler built in HD video encoder for video capture, has not been released despite Nvidia promising it will be available by now.

Overall, the GTX 780 is too expensive for 90% of people. The GTX 760 is the most reasonably priced option but the fact that it can't run an already released game in Crysis 3 means it is not future proof. This particular model, though expensive, offers the best price for the performance. I don't see myself upgrading again for at least 2 years, but unfortunately PC enthusiasm is an expensive hobby and the technology of tomorrow becomes outdated in a blink of an eye. If the hardware I currently have will let me max out most games of the incoming console cycle, I will have no complaints.

See all 139 customer reviews...More...


Senin, 20 April 2015

StarTech USB to VGA External Video Card Multi Monitor Adapter - 1920x1200 - USB to VGA External Graphics Card

StarTech USB to VGA External Video Card Multi Monitor Adapter - 1920x1200 - USB to VGA External Graphics Card..


StarTech USB to VGA External Video Card Multi Monitor Adapter - 1920x1200 - USB to VGA External Graphics Card

Buy StarTech USB to VGA External Video Card Multi Monitor Adapter - 1920x1200 - USB to VGA External Graphics Card By StarTech

Most helpful customer reviews

57 of 58 people found the following review helpful.
4Love it, after fixing sleep issue
By M
StarTech... if you're reading this, try to fix this, please! I even did analysis and found a workaround for you. The least you can do is take my assessment into account and resolve the issue.

Minus 1 star for the fact DisplayLink/StarTech cannot introduce drivers/software to resolve the adapter sleep issue. If I had not figured a solution out on my own, this product would have received only 2-stars.

This device is perfect, after I created a batch script to fix the issue where the two external monitors would stay asleep after the computer has been awaken. Will explain how to create your own after the "Cons" section below.

Some people have mentioned this occurs to them once in a while. For me, the issue occurs most of the time after the computer wakes from sleep mode.

Pros:
1) When functional, delivers perfect digital video/audio (audio on HDMI port only) to two external 1920x1080 monitors over a USB 2.0 connection. The device is connected to a hub, which also connects the keyboard and mouse.
2) Can display dvd quality to the two external monitors simultaneously, without too much cpu usage.
3) I can't speak for gaming, but my primary purpose is to use my laptop as a development machine. For development and other office functions, the adapter is more than adequate.
4) Works with Mac Mini running Lion OS as well. No wake-on-sleep issues, like I encountered on Windows 7 and 8 computers.
5) Self powered. No additional power required.
6) Customer service. They weren't able to figure out the issue, but at least they tried.

Cons:
1) The two external monitors connected to the adapter typically do not function after the laptop (Windows 8) resumes from sleep mode. I would have to unplug and reattach the USB cable to re-enable the adapter. This is not a good solution, as I'm trying to minimize the wear to the USB port and it's a pain to physically unplug/reattach the USB cable.

Fix:
I contacted StarTech regarding my issue. They told me that I should disable "Allow the computer to turn off this device to save power" for the USB Hubs listed within the Device Manager section. Unfortunately, they ignored the fact I told them the issue occurs, REGARDLESS of whether I connect the adapter directly to the laptop OR via a USB hub. But, as I said before, they tried... btw... I did try their recommendation, even though I knew it would not work. It didn't work...

Then, I performed some analysis of the processes running on my computer and discovered there is a Windows service that controls functionality and communication between the computer and the adapter... the DisplayLinkService.

Through the Windows Services management console, I was able to re-enable the two external monitors by restarting the DisplayLinkService.

Therefore, I created a batch file (FixDisplay.bat) and added the following three lines to the batch file and saved it to my desktop for easy access:

sc stop DisplayLinkService
sleep 2
sc start DisplayLinkService

Let me explain each command, so you're aware of what's going on and to assure you this is not a malware script. First line stops the DisplayLinkService. Second line pauses the batch request to allow the stop batch request to complete. The final command line starts the DisplayLinkService.

Now, whenever the external monitors do not wake up after the computer wakes from sleep mode, I simply double-click the FixDisplay.bat file that I saved to my desktop. Just a note... depending on your UAC setting, you might have to enable the batch file to run under an elevated account (i.e. Administrator), as the commands in the batch file start/stop an installed Windows service.

The best solution would be if the drivers actually worked flawlessly to wake up the adapter properly. But short of DisplayLink and/or StarTech fixing this issue, my ad-hoc solution works. The solution definitely beats unplugging/reattaching the USB cable that is inaccessible.

29 of 30 people found the following review helpful.
4Works great, even on my Mac
By Kevin Mentch
Got this as a gift after looking all over for something that would work on a Mac, however when I first tried to set it up it did not work at all. Seems as though it is not Mac compatible, but after some tinkering I was able to get it to work on my Macbook Air running OS X 10.8.4. The key is the correct driver, do not install or use the one that comes with the adapter. I figured out who actually makes this thing and went to them and they have the correct driver. It is made by a company called Magic Control Technology Corp, and you can find the drivers needed here: [...] and the direct link to the zip download here: [...]

I hope this helps everyone with getting this working on their Mac as it took me about a 4 or so hours to figure all this out.

29 of 32 people found the following review helpful.
2Works but the software created problems.
By Jimmi
The device works great and my 2560x1600 monitor looks awesome.

Con: The software created some problems. As soon as I installed it, shockwave started crashing in google chrome. I have to reboot a few times a day due to this problem. It is starting to get very annoying.

Update #1: I spent some time with tech support and they said that the driver will cause conflicts with programs that use hardware acceleration. I turned off hardware acceleration in chrome and everything seems to be fixed. I changed my review from 3 stars to 4 stars. They should warn you about this before installing the software.

Update #2: Down to 2 stars. Disabling hardware acceleration helped a bit but there are still a lot of problems with the firmware. Here are some of the issues:

- If your software program won't let you disable hardware acceleration, you are screwed. For example, Evernote app was unusable.

- Before this software, my Samsung Series 9 fan would never kick on, after installing the software, it is almost always on.

- I have the top of the line Series 9 and still get some jittering in the video.

- I get random screen flashes every 20 minutes or so.

See all 453 customer reviews...More...


Senin, 30 Maret 2015

EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Superclocked w/ACX Cooler 3GB GDDR5 384bit Dual-Link DVI-I DVI-D HDMI DP SLI Graphics Cards 03G-P4-2884-KR

EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Superclocked w/ACX Cooler 3GB GDDR5 384bit Dual-Link DVI-I DVI-D HDMI DP SLI Graphics Cards 03G-P4-2884-KR..


EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Superclocked w/ACX Cooler 3GB GDDR5 384bit Dual-Link DVI-I DVI-D HDMI DP SLI Graphics Cards 03G-P4-2884-KR

Special Price EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Superclocked w/ACX Cooler 3GB GDDR5 384bit Dual-Link DVI-I DVI-D HDMI DP SLI Graphics Cards 03G-P4-2884-KR By EVGA

Most helpful customer reviews

17 of 17 people found the following review helpful.
5Upgraded from EVGA GTX 580 - 3DMark 11 results included
By Ahmed Ramahi
Before I replace the EVGA GTX 580 with this beast, i ran a 3DMark-11 PRO Edition test (Basic - Performance test), then i simply replaced the card and did the test once i switched on the PC:
With the GTX 580 scored P6557
With the GTX 780Ti Superclocked scored P12859
You can see it is double the result. During the 3DMark tests, the lowest FPS i got was 32, while with the GTX 580 it reached 12.
Idle temp for the GTX 580 was 30c (and that's with liquid cooling), the GTX 780Ti with its ACX two fans idles at 26c
While playing Batman Arkham Origins at full graphics settings, the GTX 580 reached temps between 45c & 50c, the GTX 780Ti between 38c & 43c.

I was very confused whether to go for this one or the Titan 6Gb, but then I read in one review website (i wish if i can remember which one to reference it) that the Titan's only advantages over the 780Ti is the extra RAM, which gives performance advantage over the 780 series if:
1- You use multiple monitors.
2- You use a single monitor that is higher resolution than 1080HD (i.e. 4K HD)
3- You use heavy graphics designing and 3D modeling.
I quote one thing i clearly remember from that site "Basically the Titan is found to bridge the gap between the office/professional use and gaming use. So if you are a graphics designer who do lots of gaming the Titan is for you, but if you want raw gaming card stick with the 780 series).

By the way it is worth to note that the 780Ti Superclocked (this card in review) and 780Ti Classified (both by EVGA, the Classified is a bit faster than Superclocked and about $50 more expensive) exceed the Titan performance. Only difference is the power connectors: Superclocked requires 1x8Pin + 1x6Pin while the Classified requires 2x8Pin and this was my main reason i went for the Superclocked, otherwise I have to purchase a new PSU.

Hope this adds value to anyone who is confused which card to purchase.

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful.
5Monster card
By Matt C
2560x1440 is not an issue for this card. BF4 is smooth with Ultra settings. Fantastic performance.

I bought this instead of waiting for a R9 290X and have not been disappointed with it.

15 of 19 people found the following review helpful.
5PERFECT CARD
By AA17
This card is absolutely a MONSTER!! ... I have waited so long to get the perfect graphics card , and this card worth the wait !!
UPDATE : For those who rate this card based on the free games , I received the 3 games after 15 days of shipping , it's late but it will be received eventually
here is the link for the free games http://www.amazon.com/b/ref=br_lf_m_7730641011_grlink_4?ie=UTF8&node=7730641011&plgroup=4
This card is listed there
Please don't stain the quality of this card because of a completely separated matter !!

See all 65 customer reviews...More...