Onkyo TX-8050 Network Stereo Receiver (Black)

Onkyo TX-8050 Network Stereo Receiver (Black)..

Special Price Onkyo TX-8050 Network Stereo Receiver (Black) By Onkyo

Most helpful customer reviews

84 of 88 people found the following review helpful.
Great Sounding and Functional Receiver
By Dagger
Bought this receiver and matched it up with a pair of Paradigm Atoms w/ Auralex speaker platforms. This was for a bedroom set-up and the unit and speakers sit on a 2x dresser. I was expecting an average sound and got much more.

Pros:
1. Plays FLAC via a NTFS USB Powered Hard Drive. The hard drive I use is 640 GB. It reads the Hard Drive relatively quickly (15 sec) and scrolls through the folders very quickly.
2. Adding the receiver to the network is easy - just enter your WEP - done. You can stream WMP and with the program Jamcast you can stream Spotify, MOG, etc via DLNA. Has Pandora, MyRhapsody and some other programs already installed on the receiver. Entering your username and password for those services using a dial is probably the most painstaking effort for setting it up.
3. Most important - it sounds GREAT. I was worried about having a lean sound with Atoms and Onkyo. However, it's actually quite warm. It could be that it's in a carpeted bedroom, but whatever works. The sound optimizer for playing MP3s works well overall in smoothing out the clipping MP3s have especially in those low kb bit rates from Pandora, etc. There's only so much that can be done on low bit rate streaming.

Cons:
There are several, but minor and wouldn't change my mind from recommending it. None of these issues are related to the sound, but just convenience.
1. No subwoofer cut-off capability. I don't feel my set-up needs a subwoofer, but if it's important to you.
2. No backlighting on the control.
3. Hard Drive doesn't shut off when the receiver is off. You'll have to unplug from USB when you are done.
4. The Android App really doesn't do much except change the volume and change the input. It does play songs off the Android, but with all the other options, don't really see a need for it. Would be nice to link Spotify, MOG, etc to the Onkyo via Android App.
5. On Pure Audio, would like the display to come back on when changing folders, input, stations, etc. Have to scroll through the sound options (5 total) to get back to pure audio after changing an option.

Other than that, to reiterate I was really impressed by the sound, esp ~$600 set-up. I have a dedicated listening room with a Squeezebox, DAC, SACD, room treatments, turntable, etc. Although this Onkyo + Atom combo doesn't beat out the dedicated listening room set-up, for computer audio it comes really close.

60 of 62 people found the following review helpful.
Just what I was looking for!
By D. Matheny
I recently built a workshop in my backyard and wired it up with a network connection and stereo speakers while I was at it. The whole time I just assumed that good networked stereo receivers would be easy to come by for not much money - but it turns out I was wrong.

After a fairly extensive search, I finally came across this little bad boy. I've never owned an Onkyo product before, but I do know they have a good reputation - so I went ahead and pulled the trigger.

Just so you know, my main usage includes listening to AM & FM as well as networked radio stations and music from my local music collection that's already on my network.

After having said all that, here are the things I like about the Onkyo TX-8050:

1) The sound is excellent! I have it hooked up to a pair of Polk OWM5 speakers and they sound very good. Just what I was looking for in my workshop.

2) The Internet radio options are very good. With the vTuner, I can tune all of the radio stations I typically listen to, and they sound better than the AM or FM broadcasts. It's easy to organize network radio stations into named categories and the station names themselves can also be renamed. Overall, it's extremely easy to keep everything organized and easy to look up.

3) Configuring this receiver to play music off my network was simple. It's simply a matter of turning on media sharing on the PC where the music files are loaded and then scrolling down to that PC in the DLNA menu. I am sharing my music from a Windows 7 system. The hard drive and USB options are great - but I prefer using the network so I don't have a bunch of USB dongles hanging off the front of the receiver...

4) There are options to tune in just about any Internet music source you can think of, including: SiriusXM Internet Radio, Pandora, Rhapsody, Slacker, Mediafly, Napster, and Last.fm. Those are in addition to the vTuner option I already mentioned that lets you tune in radio stations that are also streaming over the Internet.

5) The favorites menu can be configured over the network. If you don't feel like scrolling from character to character, manually renaming everything - just load up the TX-8050 in an Internet browser and you can do all the renaming and configuring from there. This also lets you set URLs for manually streaming radio stations that haven't been added to the vTuner service. The way to do this is to get the IP address from the setup menu (such as 192.168.1.100), and then type it into your web browser like: "[...]".

6) Did I mention that the sound is excellent?!

Although, for the most part, everything is working great - I do have a few minor complaints:

1) The AM/FM reception is mediocre at best. This would be a bigger deal if my stations weren't available for Internet streaming.

2) The favorites menu is kind of cool - but the standard organization is so good that it just adds clutter in my case. It would be better if manually entered stations could just be integrated into the vTuner categories instead.

3) The network startup time is fairly long. Forget just hitting the switch and getting networked tunes in a few seconds. In my case, it takes close to a minute - and that's over a hard-wired network.

4) Setting this up was a piece of cake for me, but I wonder if someone without any networking skills would fair as well. In other words, this probably wouldn't make a great gift for dear old grandma who's just looking to listen to the radio...

Overall, this receiver is exactly what I was looking for. I wanted something with better sound than a SqueezeBox; yet with at least the same number of networking options - and the Onkyo TX-8050 pulled that combination off nicely.

I would highly recommend this if you're a techie person who wants great sound combined with all the networked music options you could want.

55 of 58 people found the following review helpful.
Excellent Product (but not perfect)
By Zeek the Geek
This review was written after two weeks of ownership, and updated at 7 and 22 months.
Do I like it? Yes.
Would I recommend it to a friend? Yes.

PROS:
- very good sound quality
- solid design and construction, audio section in particular
- DLNA and Web enabled, including Apple and Android Apps (!)
- USB port for playing from an iPod, HDD, or other MSC player
- subwoofer output (see details)
- Zone 2 output (pre-amp level only)
- firmware updates via USB or internet

CONS:
- subwoofer output does not mute when using headphones (dumb!)
- occasional DLNA lockups and web station dropout (probably the station).
- the front panel button text is hard to read, but still better than most other brands.
- runs hot even at idle (no sound).
- plays WAV files from my old Maxtor NAS just fine, but can't play the same files from my new myDitto NAS (the MyDitto had very poor DLNA access anyway, I now use a new WD My Book Live NAS, which again works fine with the Onkyo)

I needed a modestly priced stereo receiver for my office and found quite a few candidates on the web including models by Sony, Sherwood, and Onkyo. A few intriguing brand X products showed up also, but the user reviews were poor enough to scare me off. Even the Sony and Sherwood models had their hate mail, so I zeroed in on the Onkyo models. Funny that I should buy Onkyo again because I chose an Onkyo model for our 7.1 home theater system a couple of years ago.

The Onkyo TX-8050 was twice what I was planning to pay, but the networking caught my eye. With that feature I can listen to internet radio and music from my NAS without turning on my PC. Some reviewers had problems with that feature, but reading between the lines I felt they may not have been very experienced with the technology, which can be painful.

The advanced features are pretty significant for a stereo receiver; here is an overview:
- Seven web audio services including Pandora, Last, Slacker, and Spotify. You enter your username and password only once into the receiver directly, or via PC browser.
- 40 available memories to store favorite web stations, set locally or via PC web browser.
- DNLA sees all LAN media servers, in my case a WIN 7 PC, Twonky and NAS media server.
- USB port plays any MSC device, including large HHD (one connection on front panel only)
- FM presets can be named (but only by extensive remote control gymnastics).

Everything works pretty much as promised. The browser setup and Favorites interface is great. It is so much better than character entry from the remote control (slow). The Android app setup for my Asus tablet was easy, and works very well. The GUI looks great on my Android cell phone, but on a 10" tablet it is huge, vertical only, and low resolution. But again, a very intuitive interface, much better than the Android apps for my Roku or WD media players.

Other specs of interest: composite video switching (not much use these days), 80W/CH, headphone jack, phono input(!), 2 coaxial and 2 optical digital inputs. I connected my PC's SPDIF output to one of these, and DVD output to another. The D/A section of the receiver is likely to be much better than the built-in sound cards of most PCs.

There are various Listening Modes including a Music Optimizer to "enhance the sound quality of compressed music files". Be careful not to leave this on when listening to uncompressed files!

Is it perfect? Hardly.
- As with every single media player I have ever used, the player firmware is quirky. But at least this one is reliable enough to enjoy regularly.
- Menu structure could be improved, and you don't always get what you expected. For example, depending on the internet source, you may have to press Enter two or three times to "dig deeper" into the URL (this is not a delay issue, only related to the particular web site).
- The NET and USB menus are as good as can be expected for on 2-line display, but can be time consuming when browsing.
- I have yet to make the M3U Playlists on my media server work. The first selection plays correctly, and then seems to wander off course almost randomly.
- The subwoofer output is not processed in any way except volume; there is no bass management, EQ, etc. What's even worse is that it stays ON even when headphones are being used, even when neither speaker is selected. This is something they should be able to fix in the next firmware update, if and when it comes (none as of Dec 2012).
- If you intend to use the Zone 2 feature, be aware that volume changes can be made on the remote only, not from the front panel volume control. Inconvenient but workable.
- There is only one "input" selector to enter the internet mode (NET). Three selectors should have been provided: one for DNLA, one for web services, and a third for Favorites.

Onkyo should be credited for introducing a networked media (audio) player in a stereo receiver. It has all the features you'd ever want in a stereo unit, and then some. And thankfully, the design has no major faults that will cause you to hate the product later.

Updated Jan 2014 - More good and bad to report:

GOOD: I finally got a smart (Android) cellphone and the Onkyo App is VERY good. You have much easier control over network access, down to the songs on your DLNA devices and internet music services. The interface is configurable to your specific setup, such as skipping inputs and services you aren't using. I hadly ever use the front panel controls now. (just in case you don't know, you must have both the receiver and cellphone conencted to your home network.

BAD: Other reviewers report and I also experience the unit disconnecting from the network for no apparent reason. This happens at least once a week or more. A 'cold re-boot' is the only way to get it to connect again. I have installed a power switch at the wall plug to make this easier, but what a pain. ONKYO??

See all 259 customer reviews...More...

Intel Network 7260.HMWG WiFi Wireless-AC 7260 H/T Dual Band 2x2 AC+Bluetooth HMC

Intel Network 7260.HMWG WiFi Wireless-AC 7260 H/T Dual Band 2x2 AC+Bluetooth HMC..

GET Intel Network 7260.HMWG WiFi Wireless-AC 7260 H/T Dual Band 2x2 AC+Bluetooth HMC By Intel

Most helpful customer reviews

79 of 87 people found the following review helpful.
Older HP Dv7 - Wifi works great - Bluetooth No Go BUT...
By digitalPimple
The card works great and my speeds over AC are a nice improvement. I am still bottle-necked as I'm using an older HP-DV7 1000 series laptop with this card.

For those that may not know; if you receive an error at start-up after install, this means your laptops manufacture has blocked the card from working (Only approved cards). You will need to re-flash your laptops bios/firmware with a modified version that remove this 'blocking' function. (white listed)

You can find a few sites out there that specialize in listing modified bios/firmwares based on your laptops model and bios/firmware version removing the 'white listing' completely. Take your time with this if you're new.

---------------

Intel now offers the drivers for this card. If you want to use the Bluetooth function be sure to get the Bluetooth Intel software package FIRST before installing the Intel Wireless Drivers.

The Bluetooth works only over G wireless so be prepared for setup issues and some playing. Read Intel instructions on this. This may not just be a plug and play feature for your situation.

Link to Intel Bluetooth package and setup Info: [...]
Intel WiFi driver packages: [...]

Good luck!
If you found this useful please click YES below please!!! Thx

22 of 24 people found the following review helpful.
Great product from Intel
By J. Bennett
I purchased this card in combination with the new ASUS RT-AC66U where I installed DD-WRT. I installed this card on my Lenovo V570 after removing the BIOS blacklist. The Lenovo V570 has two antennas so that worked well with this card. I downloaded the drivers from Intel and installed them on a Windows 7 x64. It works very well, so far I have not experienced any disconnects as other users have, maybe because I used the latest Intel driver. I have not tested bluetooth.

I have configured my router for 80Mhz of bandwidth at 5Ghz 802.11ac and 40Mhz for 2.4Ghz. I have also checked the settings for the Intel AC 7260 and changed the following:

- 802.11n Channel Width for 2.4Ghz: Auto
- 802.11n Channel Width for 5.2Ghz: Auto
- Preferred Band: 3. Prefer 5.2Ghz band

I also checked multiple channels for the 5Ghz interface. Some channels were pretty bad with connection speeds of 70mbit/sec.

I have my router upstairs and use the laptop downstairs. The connection speed at 5GHz shows in DD-WRT and Windows at 585 mbit/sec. My old 802.11n card was connecting at 144 mbit/sec. After testing some file transfers, the effective bandwidth was around 15MB/sec, which is effectively around 120mbit/sec, 10 times the 1MB/sec that I was getting with the 802.11n. In theory I should be seeing transfers of 60-70 MB/sec but I am happy with my 10x improvement. Now if you are testing this card by transferring some files, your storage needs to be able to handle these transfer speeds. I have a 10TB storage array connected to my server via 4Gigabit Fibrechannel that can do more than 300MB/sec (limited by the 1gbit/sec network connection of the router to 120MB/sec) and I use an Intel last generation flash SLC drive on my laptop that will easily do 100MB/sec, so my backend storage can support true 1 gigabit/sec.

One last thing, be aware that the seller SPICY BOMB is selling fake cards. These cards are Atheros AR9462/AR5BWB222 with a photocopied sticker from an Intel card. These are not even AC wireless cards. If you purchased this card from SPICY BOMB, please look at the sticker and see if you have WFM: 0C8BFD2C745A and BDM: 0C8BFD2C745E. If you do, you have the fake card. You can also identify the fake because the antenna connectors are marked CH0 and CH1 instead of 1 and 2 like the Intel.

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
Great upgrade for my Dell XPS 17!
By John Platt
My Dell XPS 17 (Model L1702X) was having problems with it's built-in Intel 6230N wireless card, so I finally decided to replace it. After studying on new cards i wanted to get a card that could use the full potential of my new Router (NETGEAR Wireless Router - AC1750 Dual Band Gigabit (R6300) - Manufacturer Refurbished. Mine was purchased from Mobile Computing Solutions and shows up as the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260. It connects at 866.7 Mbps to my netgear R6300 version 1 router using the Wireless AC standard which is amazingly fast, it's almost like connecting with a cable.

Installation:
I downloaded the latest windows 7 drivers previously. You need to first download the Bluetooth drivers which for windows 7 64bit is BT_3.1.1311_s64. Then I had to find the windows drivers. I used the drivers only which is Wireless_16.6.0_Ds64. There is also a newer Wireless_16.7.0_Ds64 that is out as well.

I looked up dissassembly instructions online for my Dell XPS 17 Laptop (L1702X). I took apart my case and removed my Wireless card, which had two wires connected but three available (one was wrapped and not used). It replaced an Intel 6230N. I then put in the new card and used the previous screw to screw it in. The antenna wires were popped back on the same sides. I then put my laptop back together which was hard since I had to remove the keyboard and several small screws from throughout the system.

I then booted the laptop and installed the bluetooth drivers and network drivers again. I then connected to my wireless network using the new card.

Troubleshooting: I was only connecting at 54Mbps at first and I was having connection issues. Here is how I fixed it...
For those with wireless-n and wireless-ac routers you may have to troubleshoot your windows settings if you have "upgraded" your card. In the control panel, go to the Device manager, go to network section, and double-click on the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260. Now clicked on Advance. Under Ad-hoc choose WMM Enabled, under HT mode choose VHT, under preferred band choose 5.2ghz, under transmit power choose 5 highest, and under wireless mode choose 6: 802.11 a/b/g. Press okay to save changes.

Inside your router go to the QOS section (in my netgear router it can be found in advanced>Setup>QOS Setup). Make sure WMM is enabled. Save changes.

Another thought is to use a program like DNS Bench to find the best DNS server for you. I added my provider's DNS to the generated list and it turned out that Charter's DNS (one of the two provided) was the fastest and a level 3 dns server was second fastest for me. I added both as static dns server's to my router.

Final Thoughts:
I love this wireless card. You'll have to ignore the Windows 7 bug that claims you are connecting to a Wireless N network and the driver bug that states you only connect to a/b/g networks. The one device bug right now is that your router needs WMM enabled. This does not make sense since my wireless AC usb adapters such as the Edimax AC adapter, did not have this problem. Overall the Intel 7260 connects faster than the Edimax EW-7811UTC AC600 Dual-Band USB Adapter, Mini Size Easy to Carry, Supports Both 11AC ( 5GHz Band ) and 11n ( 2.4GHz Band ) Wi-Fi Connectivity, Upgrades your PC / Laptop for Exceeding Streaming and Faster Download. It actually is twice as fast since its 866.7 Mbps compared to 430Mbps , not to mention it fits inside my laptop so I can't break it. Overall if you don't mind opening your laptop this is a great deal for Wireless AC router owners!

If this review was helpful then please click the button! Thanks!

See all 165 customer reviews...More...

Synology DiskStation 2-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (NAS) DS214

Synology DiskStation 2-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (NAS) DS214..

GET Synology DiskStation 2-Bay (Diskless) Network Attached Storage (NAS) DS214 By Synology

Most helpful customer reviews

78 of 82 people found the following review helpful.
A small and mighty NAS
By Scott
Watch Video Here: http://www.amazon.com/review/R2AYAEMI103S6I The Synology DS214 is the latest updated version of its mid-range home/soho 2-bay NAS.

The unit itself is pretty barebones and doesn't have that solid quality feel that I prefer in most products given it's thin metal case and plastic build, but it's functional and gets the job done as a NAS case that's not going to be moved around once setup.

The plastic drive trays are a tool less design, just pop the sides off, drop your hard drive in, and pop the sides back on to secure the drive in place.

As with all the home or small office NAS units this only features a single Gigabit ethernet port, however in those installations you wouldn't have the higher end networking switches capable of supporting dual Gigabit nics anyway.

The USB ports are handy for when attaching a UPS backup in order to have the NAS shutdown in the event of a power outage, but I would never recommend using them for USB Drive backup of the NAS - that entirely missing the point of purchasing a NAS unless you intend to transfer the USB drive to another safe location for disaster recovery.

The CPU is a modest dual core, and ram is somewhat limited at 512mb, making this a serviceable NAS for very limited applications running on it and light file server duty. If you're intending to run a significant number of apps and services on the NAS you should consider upgrading the ram or purchasing a larger Synology NAS with a better CPU and Ram support (1-3Gb is often enough for most uses).

Management of the NAS is stellar, the Synology DSM is a great example of what all consumer hardware like this should have, a simple straightforward GUI that cuts out all the complexity of a complicated device allowing home and office users the ability to manage it without ongoing tech support.

The free applications available for the Synology DSM are really what makes their product line shine. Simply clicking on install on one of their apps turns your NAS into anything from the typical file server to a music server, media server (Movies, Pictures), home security camera video storage, VPN server, tons of other business related apps, and many 3rd party community ports from popular Linux apps. You really need to just check out their full App listing to see how easily you can turn these units into an efficient always on server for your home or small business.

Being a 2-bay NAS, if you're not familiar with RAID 1, please keep in mind that you will only have slightly less than half the storage total of the 2 drives you install if you want the ability to not lose data in the event of a single drive failure. If you're not concerned about redundancy with the disks, then your entire capacity will be available to you for storage but is not recommended given the risk of disk failure in the first year of ownership.

If you're serious about capacity, redundancy, performance, and the most bang for your buck I highly recommend considering Synology's larger 4-8 drive NAS units. By going with a larger NAS using multiple hard drives you can purchase multiple less expensive hard drives that will increase your overall performance and redundancy in case of a disk failure. A 2-bay NAS such as this in Raid 1 means you're wasting half your space for redundancy, where a larger NAS would typically only use 20-25% of your capacity for redundancy.

With that said if you feel the DS214 will fit your needs and budget it's definitely a great little unit for the money.

32 of 32 people found the following review helpful.
Great NAS - easy to install, very good NAS performance
By MarkABee
I have a lot of NAS's. I have a Synology 1513+, QNAP 2 Bay, DROBO 5N and have had a number of HP Windows Home Servers and I have some of the single drive Seagate and Western Digital boxes as well.

The DS214 is in a different class than the Seagate/WD boxes. No comparison. If you are new to NAS, you probably are not aware that the CPU/Memory of the NAS box has a lot to do with its performance. How fast does it copy files? How fast does it serve them up? How fast does your DLNA server index and serve up music, etc. Faster better CPU's mean snappier performance. This box is fast - almost as fast as my Synology 1511+. In transferring some test photo files (average size 28M) files, I got 80-90 MB/second across a wired 1TB network. That's very good. Some consumer class devices (other 1 and 2 bay devices) get about 20-30 MB/second so the DS214 is definitely in a different class.

I have stored about 2TB of music and I am using it as a music server. Did I mention that it is fast? It was extremely simple to configure as a DNLA server and as an iTunes server.

One of the big advantages of Synology is their DSM software which you use to configure that NAS. It has a very nice graphical interface that makes it friendly to use. And, there is an application download platform that allows you to download additional software. Management software differs by manufacturer. I like Synology's.

The DS214 is expensive but I feel it is worthwhile. When you move lots of files into a NAS, you want to retain the snappy performance you might have from a local hard disk. So, faster is better. Most people that buy a NAS have a lot of data and store music, videos and photos. If you ever need to transfer over a lot of data (1TB or more) you know that it can take 4-12 hours across the network. I have owned several Synology NAS's and I think they are high performance, easy to use, but you pay a little premium. Over the long term, the premium is more than made up for by better performance and ease of use.

I will buy another Synology again next time.

31 of 33 people found the following review helpful.
Sleek and nice
By Jonville Joseph
Works great. This product looks sleek, is silent, and considering the price reduction compared to previous years model, it's definitely a great deal for anyone looking for a personal home NAS (2 bays may be a bit small for company use). Plus, the built quality is great and feels robust. I bought this NAS with 2x3TO WD RED.

The nicest thing is without a doubt the NAS operating system. Synology DSM is undoubtedly the most well done GUI you'll find on a NAS.

See all 38 customer reviews...More...

Synology America DiskStation 8-Bay Diskless Network Attached Storage (DS1813+)

Synology America DiskStation 8-Bay Diskless Network Attached Storage (DS1813+)..

Buy Synology America DiskStation 8-Bay Diskless Network Attached Storage (DS1813+) By Synology

Most helpful customer reviews

42 of 42 people found the following review helpful.
Moving Away from Windows Home Server
By Joe
I purchased this product following careful consideration of many similar options in the NAS category. I have been a user of Windows Home Server (WHS) since it was released. My server has reached its reasonable limit in terms of disk upgrades and backup. I've really liked Windows Home Server, but was distressed when the newest version (2011) removed the option for disk flexibility known as "drive extender."

As a home user, I was not excited to migrate from one server to another. Though I consider myself to be technically savvy, I am not formally trained in networking or server administration. However, I was running out of space on WHS and was beginning to experience access issues with the WHS software. So, I spent a great deal of time looking at options for replacement. As I looked at "home server" replacements, it became very clear that the NAS category has taken over this realm in recent years. Synology and several others have floated to the top of this category and many reviews are available discussing this company's products.

I spent time reading about specific Synology products on review sites and on the support sections of Synology's websites prior to this purchase. I also spent time reviewing drives that are appropriate for use in a RAID setup, as I'd not personally owned or setup a RAID before. I made the choice to purchase the Synology 1813+ as it looked like a good balance hardware and software options and has lots of room for expansion. I decided to outfit my server with four (4) Western Digital 4TB SE drives as the home-use "Red" version did not have a 4TB drive (at the time of my purchase).

SETUP:
Setup was rather simple, but was enhanced only by my prior reading on this device. There are essentially no instructions that come in the box at the time of delivery. I placed the drives in the tool-less enclosures, upgraded the RAM to 4GB with a Kingston memory module, connected the unit to my gigabit network and powered up. A few minutes later I was able to access the unit and download the latest software, which also installed without a hitch. The DSM software is outstanding and generally friendlier than the WHS software I've been using. There are many ways to establish a multi-disk volume including all forms of RAID; I chose to setup a single volume on a Synology Hybrid Raid (SHR-2) setup...basically a 2-drive fault tolerance setup. Volume creation and optimization took some time - several days in fact; but I was able to use the volume during the optimization to create users and shared folders.

Using the DSM software, I configured the unit for Windows and Apple networking, setup the free antivirus software, and created shared folders and users. The online Synology Wiki and documentation was a tremendous help here. I also downloaded the .pdf manual to assist with setup.

Network setup for link aggregation (LAG) was difficult, possibly due to my inexperience with complex networking - though I have experience with basic network configuration and wiring. I eventually discovered that my old Dell 24-port gigabit switch was not up to the task due to its lack of LACP support. I did wish to take advantage of a LAG setup using the four gigabit ports on the 1813+, so I chose to purchase a Cisco SG200-26 switch from Amazon. Though it was not listed in the compatibility table at Synology, other reviews suggested it would work well. After moving to the new switch I was able to setup a 4-port LAG with LACP with a bit of fiddling with both the Synology NAS and the Cisco Switch. Though this is not meant to be a Cisco review, the SG200-26 switch impresses me with its ability to be setup in a multitude of ways and eclipses the flexibility of my prior switch.

Internet setup is another adventure that seems to be based upon the router you have, its support of universal Plug-and-Play, and the ability of the Synology software to automatically configure port-forwarding. Personally, I've had some challenges with port-forwarding, which I ended-up configuring manually on my Netgear Router. Once I had manually completed the port forwarding and accomplished the free Synology dynamic DNS setup (a nice bonus), I had no further problems.

FILE SHARING:
I setup share folders similar to those on my still running WHS and began to copy files from one share to another. This was no small task and there are many headaches that can arise (not as the result of equipment). I chose to use GoodSync software as I was able to see errors along the way and files that may have been excluded. This took a number of days for me to complete my file migration as some supervision is involved over time. Once I had moved the files, file sharing on this device is very easy and works seamlessly provided that you've enabled the appropriate services on the DSM. It was also necessary to make sure that the Windows workgroup was appropriately named on the Synology Device in order to see the server on all of my windows machines.

BACKUP:
The Synology NAS functions well as a backup target for multiple OSs. Apple Time Machine has worked very well in particular. My setup of this function was guided by the online Synology resources describing this setup; this allowed me to create a Time Machine specific user with a limit on total size utilization of my RAID single storage volume. I calculated the Time Machine user's storage limit based upon size of the drives in each of my Macs with a multiplier. I have three Macs that I've been backing up with Time Machine and this has generally worked well over the network. The only issue I've encountered is that on occasion the backup must be redone if you are not careful shutting down the Mac machine during attempts at a backup. In order to fix the situation you may have to kill an existing connection in the DSM and restart the backup from the Mac.

Windows machines are a bit more challenging, actually. WHS clearly spoiled me with its nearly intervention free background backup processes. I've found that the Synology Data Replicator 3 software is excellent for the purpose of backup of documents and important files; however, it doesn't serve as a "bare metal," bit-for-bit backup of an entire system. Windows 7 backup is well suited to backup the entire system, but is not at all considerate of the amount of space it takes on a large RAID volume. There are ways to get around this with user limitations, but they are not well documented and have involved a lot of experiments in backup setup and folder management. WHS did things well here as it retained only one copy of any given file and was savvy with space considerations during backup. I've considered dedicated backup software such as Acronis, but am still in the process of evaluating use of software that is either included with Synology or Windows 7.

Finally, I recently added a WD 4TB external drive (USB 3.0) as a backup drive to the native share folders using the Syology "Time Backup" app in the Synology package management tool. Many have noted that a NAS with RAID is not the same as backup. Basically, if a RAID fails and you're unable to recover it, life is bad. For those considering this as a backup target, it's OK to use it in that fashion. However, if a share is the primary location of a file then RAID is not an acceptable form of "backup." Synology has abundant backup options including backup to several commercial cloud solutions, backup to other local or remote Synology servers, backup to other network drives, and backup to internal or USB 2.0/3.0 attached drives. The external USB 3.0 option has worked well for me and the Time Backup software is similar in appearance and function to Apple's Time Machine software - therefore it's familiar and intuitive as a current Mac user.

SOFTWARE:
To date I've setup the server with an antivirus scanner, the PLEX media server, the Cloud software, Time Backup, and the VPN server. So far, I've been most impressed with the cloud server, "Cloud Station." This Synology-developed app has moved me completely away from Dropbox, my old "go to" solution. It is surprisingly mature software with setup solutions for mobile devices, Windows, Apple, and Linux. Setup is simple and intuitive. It has a generous maximum single file size of 10GB (for the purposes of sync) that will work well for my needs.

One consideration with respect to software is the processing power of the CPU. With the 2-core processor and abundant network connectivity, the 1813+ is easily able to stream HD video content (without transcoding) to most platforms. Transcoding is also supported on available software platforms; however, transcoding has the potential to be problematic if HD material must be heavily processed prior to viewing on the destination hardware. There are several articles discussing this issue in the Plex forums, and alternatives include an intermediate workstation with the Synology unit as a file server only. I'm still looking at these options, but did not buy this unit for its transcoding prowess.

I've not spent time with hosting e-mail, a blog, a website, CRM software, or other types of options; however, many of these options are available for installation using the software package management tool. Upgrades of installed software are easily accomplished with notification and the click of a button.

RAID VOLUME MANAGEMENT:
About a week into my use I decided to add two additional WD SE 4TB drives to my SHR-2 array. This was incredibly simple - just insert the two new drives into empty bays (no need to turn off the server) and add them to the volume using options in DSM software. Once again, it took several days to add the space into the array, but there were no issues and I was able to continue to use the NAS during the upgrade.

POWER MANAGEMENT:
Unintentional loss of power can be a serious issue for any computer, server, or NAS. I purchased a Cyber Power UPS at a local big box store, powered down the NAS, plugged it in to the USB, and restarted the NAS. The Synology immediately recognized the UPS (even though it was not on the supported list) and reported it in the hardware section. I was then able to setup a power-based shutdown plan should power be lost for longer than supported by the UPS. This was the only downtime the NAS has required since I the purchased the Synology unit.

CONCLUSION:
I'm very impressed with the Synology 1813+ NAS. It should last me for a period of time that is at least equal to my former WHS setup. With its expansion options, I hope it lasts much longer. I've had to learn a bit more about networking, but for someone who has been through a prior build and setup of a home server this has been mostly pain free. Clearly when you by a NAS you will have to incur additional expenses for drives and other options that you may choose. Complete setup will take time, especially if you're migrating from another server platform. Some might argue that an 8-bay Synology NAS is overkill for any home user. They may be right. I would suggest that those who have a strong interest in a conservatively setup RAID volume, on a NAS, with multiple expansion options, and multiple backup options will be hard-pressed to find something better than a Synology 1813+.

MY SETUP:
NAS: Synology 1813+
RAID DRIVES: 6X Western Digital 4 TB 3.5-Inch WD SE (WD4000F9YZ)
RAM UPGRADE: 1X Kingston ValueRAM 2GB 1066MHz DDR3
NETWORK SWITCH: Cisco SG200-26
ROUTER: Netgear R4500
EXTERNAL DRIVE: 1X Western Digital My Book 4 TB USB 3.0 (WDBFJK0040HBK-NESN)
UPS POWER: Cyber Power CP 1350C
NETWORK CONFIG: LAG via LACP (4X Gigabit LAN)

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION/REFERENCES:
1) Several questions have been answered regarding drive choice and energy/noise specs under the comments section of my WD SE 4TB drive review:Western Digital 4 TB 3.5-Inch WD Se SATA III 7200 RPM 64 MB Cache Bulk/OEM Enterprise Hard Drive WD4000F9YZ[Amazon Frustration-Free Packaging]
2) Reviews of the Cisco switch:Cisco SG200-26 Gigabit Ethernet Smart Switch with 24 10/100/1000 Ports and 2 Combo Mini-GBIC Ports (SLM2024T)
3) Reviews of the external My Book Drive:WD My Book 4TB USB 3.0 Hard Drive with Security, Local and Cloud Backup (WDBFJK0040HBK-NESN)
4) Kingston ValueRAM module:Kingston ValueRAM 2GB 1066MHz DDR3 Non-ECC CL7 SODIMM Single Rank x8 Notebook Memory

78 of 83 people found the following review helpful.
Exceptional Eight Bay NAS, with Optional Capabilities that Rival those Available to Full Fledged Servers
By Charles Hooper
Several long months following the announcement of the DS1813+, this unit is finally available. I have previously purchased and implemented Synology Diskstation DS412+, DS212+, and DS112J units (as well as a variety of Windows file servers (NT 4.0 through 2012) and Linux servers), so network attached storage (NAS) devices are not entirely new to me. The Synology DS412+, DS212+, and DS112J units are used primarily for their FTP server capability, although the units also provide one or more Windows shares to network computers using either Active Directory integration or Synology Diskstation internal user accounts.

Starting in 2004, I introduced into the network a couple of Linux servers running Samba with Winbind to integrate into a Windows NT 4 domain, and later an Active Directory domain. Those Linux servers worked great for a month or two at a time, until the servers would either lock up solid, or the Samba/Winbind daemon would simply crash - in the process taking down all Windows connectivity to the Linux server. I have been reminded of this Samba/Winbind issue a couple of times in the last year as the Synology DiskStation DS412+ occasionally stopped permitting connections from Windows clients (usually just before a BackupExec disk to disk backup was sent to the Diskstation), while FTP connections continued to work without issue. A reboot of the DiskStation DS412+ was required to recover from the apparent Samba/Winbind issue; 90% of the time, a requested reboot through the Synology interface would result in a hung DiskStation (blue flashing light on the front console) that could only be fixed by pulling the electrical power cord.

The Synology DiskStation DS412+ seems to share a lot in common with the Synology DiskStation DS1812+ (both have Intel Atom D2700 CPUs with 1GB of memory, and likely run the same binary version of the DSM operating system). The apparent Samba/Winbind issue and normal inability to successfully warm boot are the reasons why I did not purchase another DS412+ or a DS1812+, and instead waited for the availability of the DS1813+. The Synology (DSM) graphical user interface (GUI) that layers on top of a Linux kernel is a big selling point for the Synology devices, and is one of the reasons why I decided to purchase another Synology device rather than seeking a different brand.

With four gigabit network ports, six USB ports (two of which are USB 3), and two eSATA , the Synology DiskStation DS1813+ offers significant storage expansion options (supports up to two DX513 five hard drive bay expansion units). The DS1813+ internally supports up to eight hard drives in one of several software RAID levels (SHR, RAID 1, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10). Drive installs are performed without using a screwdriver, with the drive carriages held in place by a flimsy lock and key mechanism.

The DS1813+ ships without an installed operating system, so the first task after powering on the DS1813+ with the hard drives installed involves installing the latest DSM operating system. The 112MB operating system file must be downloaded from the Synology website in addition to the 49MB installer for the Synology Assistant program, which uploads the operating system to the DS1813+. Once downloaded, the operating system installation should complete in a couple of minutes without a lot of issues. While upgrading the DSM operating system through the GUI is a simple task, downgrading to an earlier release of the DSM operating system is not possible through the DSM GUI - a remote telnet session is required to manipulate certain files in order to facilitate the installation of an earlier DSM version.

The Synology DSM operating system offers a fantastic graphical user interface which implements HTML5 and CSS, displaying the interface in a web browser. Much like Windows Explorer, the File Station utility that is built into the DSM operating system supports context sensitive drag and drop, and well as right mouse button popup menus. The File Station utility that is included in the latest DSM version supports displaying more than 300 files in a paged view - that 300 file limit was an irritation when attempting to copy, move, or delete several thousand security camera videos on a daily basis through the GUI. Like the other DSM models, the DS1813+ supports telnet sessions, which allow access to the Linux command line and the configuration of scheduled script execution through the modification of the /etc/crontab file (side note: I have had issues with only the DS112J automatically resetting the contents of the /etc/crontab file when the DiskStation was power cycled - I believe that problem was caused by the use of spaces rather than tabs as field delimiters in the file).

A plain vanilla install of the DSM 4.2-3214 offers support for network shares (Windows, MAC, and NFS), iSCSI, Active Directory Integration, FTP (standard FTP, anonymous FTP, FTPS, SFTP, TFTP), website hosting, WebDAV, SNMP, remote command line with telnet or SSH, integrated firewall, VPN client, USB printer sharing, and a handful of other capabilities. The DSM operating system's native functionality is easily expanded through the download of free software packages from the Synology website. The packages extend the DS1813+'s capabilities to include antivirus, Asterisk IP phone server, Internet radio rebroadcasting to networked computers, DHCP and DNS server functionality, iTunes Server, VPN server, RADIUS server, email server, CRM and ERP packages, IP camera monitoring (includes a license for one IP camera, additional licenses are roughly $50 per camera), and a variety of other features. Additionally, ipkg support permits the installation of roughly 900 additional applications, including C++ compilers - which in theory suggests that the source for the Nagios network monitoring utility can be downloaded and compiled on the DS1813+.

For testing purposes, I installed four of five new Western Digital Red 3TB drives, configured in a software RAID 10 array (DSM attempts to automatically configure the drives in a SHR array, so configuring the drives for RAID 10, to reduce recovery time in the event of a drive failure, requires a couple of additional mouse clicks). Peak single network link data transfer speeds so far have been impressive, at close to the maximum possible transfer rate for a gigabit network (achieving roughly 115MB/s ~ 920Mb/s), even with the DiskStation concurrently performing "Parity Consistency Check"/"Data Scrubbing" on the newly created RAID 10 array (roughly 19 hours were required for the "Parity Consistency Check"/"Data Scrubbing" operation to complete, during which the DS1813+ was fully usable). Pushing approximately 2.1TB of large files from a fast Windows Server 2012 machine across a gigabit network to the DS1813+ required roughly 6 hours, yielding an effective transfer speed of roughly 102MB/s. Pushing a single 7.53GB file from the same server to the DS1813+ resulted in a 113MB/s effective transfer speed, while consuming an average 20% of the DS1813+'s CPU capacity and drawing 46 watts of power (the DS1813+ with four Western Digital Red drives idles at approximately 39 watts, uses roughly 46 watts during file transfers, and peaks at roughly 60 watts during power up).

With two of the DiskStation's network ports (configured for IEEE 802.3ad dynamic link aggregation) attached to an HP 4208vl switch (switch ports configured in a LACP 802.3ad group), push copying a single 7.53GB file from a server (two gigabit network ports, with the switch configured for Trunk aggregation), or concurrently from a server and a fast client computer (with SSD drive) did not exceed the throughput of a single gigabit connection (the server averaged roughly 62MB/s, while the client computer's throughput was a little slower). During the simultaneous push copy attempt from the server and fast client computer, the DS1813+'s CPU spiked to 25% utilization. More testing is required to determine why the IEEE 802.3ad dynamic link aggregation test did not exceed a transfer rate of 1Gb/s (the LEDs on the front of the DS1813+ show that both LAN ports are connected, however, the second LAN port LED rarely flashes).

I attached a Western Digital 3TB My Book external hard drive (WDBACW0030KBK-NESN) to a USB 3 port on the Windows Server 2012 machine and recorded throughput speed of roughly 150MB/s, which is impressive considering that a Western Digital Green drive is likely enclosed in the My Book. I attached a second Western Digital 3TB My Book external hard drive to a USB3 port on the DS1813+ and formatted the drive using the ext4 file system (Synology's recommended file system). I then connected to the DS1813+ through a telnet session (to avoid GUI update associated delays) and issued a command to copy a 446.3GB file to the My Book - the average transfer rate was 98.9MB/s (roughly 66% of the Windows Server 2012 machine's speed when copy a large file to a similar My Book) with 20% average CPU utilization, as displayed by the DS1813+'s GUI.

While the throughput and CPU of the DS1813+ with software based RAID are no match for the performance and capacity of a high end Windows or Linux server, the power sipping Synology NAS is competitively priced, should yield a lower total cost of ownership (TCO), and is likely easier to configure for its intended purpose than either a Windows or Linux server. The DS1813+ reportedly supports up to 512 concurrent remote connections from other devices (a computer with five mapped drives pointing to the DS1813+ consumes five of those 512 concurrent connections), although I have encountered some problems with the DS112J blocking connection attempts long before its 64 concurrent limit is reached - I do not yet know if this issue affects any of the other Synology devices. The lack of an available redundant power supply is a shortcoming of the DS1813+, so it might be wise to purchase a spare power supply to keep on the shelf, should the need arise.

Synology offers a group of customer support forums. However, those forums are apparently not actively monitored by Synology support staff. Thus far, one person on the forums reported that the power supply in their DS1813+ failed within the first 24 hours of use, while a second person reported a buzzing sound being emitted from their DS1813+ power supply. The power supply in my DS1813+ is absolutely quiet, and both large fans are spinning at a very quiet, casual speed.

Considering all of its potential capability to be an email, CRM, ERP, or web server, the DS1813+ is expected to serve perfectly in its role as a simple Active Directory integrated disk to disk backup destination, connected by a single gigabit fiber optic link. This review (and the attached rating) will be updated should the DS1813+ experience apparent Samba/Winbind issues, as were experienced with the DS412+, or any other problems. The Synology DiskStation DS1813+ currently meets or exceeds expectations for its planned intended use.

25 of 27 people found the following review helpful.
Glad the drobo broke for me - this is amazing
By Brian
Must admit, I purchased first a drobo in hopes it was going to work for my situation because of the speed it claimed. Unfortunately, I couldn't share it with a multi-platform network so this is what I ended up getting instead. I'm so glad I did. This has the flexibility of using different size drives (using the syn-hybrid raid method), still offers industry raid methods, runs cool, has 4 NIC's and a plethora of connectors.

I originally thought I was going to be able to connect the usb 3 to my pc, you can't. It's for externally connecting devices (other external hard drives, tv tuners, etc).

I tested the failed drive scenario and it went perfectly, turned it off, pulled one of the drives, put in a new drive. It instantly recognized a degraded status and told me it needed to rebuild. Interface for managing it is 100x better than drobo, so much easier, and don't have to install anything on my machine.

Performance has been really good for it being a NAS. I'm consistently seeing 100mbs connections. I also just purchased a cisco switch to take advantage of the link aggregation. For those who are like me and a little new to networking stuff. Link Aggregation isn't going to give you insane speeds from one machine, what it will let you do though is have much better speeds with multiple machines. In my network I have 4 pc's and 2 macs connecting to the NAS. I use it as a crashplan endpoint (you can install a headless crashplan client on it - though unsupported by the folks at crashplan) and it works great.

I also am using it as a storage device for my larger media files, etc and haven't had any issues. I have 2 machines that are SSD raids so storage quantity is limited and needed somewhere to put the big files.

All in all, I must admit, it works awesome and I have been so pleased. I'm grateful that the drobo 5d I originally purchased went south on me as I wouldn't have found this by looking for other alternatives. This was well worth the additional cost.
==========================================================
On a side note - Link Aggregation (because I struggled to figure this out):
1) Set it up on the Synology first, it will tell you there is an error, that's ok. Next, set it up on the switch:
2) The Cisco 300 series does work with this - I can confirm it did for me. In order to set it up on the cisco (web ui) go to Port Management > Link Aggregation > LAG Management. Create a LAG and add the ports. the key though is BEFORE you hit apply with the ports and everything, make sure to check the LACP checkbox. If you don't, you have to delete and recreate. This is the only way the link aggregation works.

After you set it up on the switch, you can go back into the synology management page and the error should be gone now.

*** UPDATE *** - 2014-02-22
I've been using this for a while now and I have to admit, best purchase I've made in a long time. This NAS is one of those things where the gift keeps on giving...
Cloud Station: I discovered this week 'Cloud Station' as one of the applications they offer. I've been looking for something that could augment my current dropbox account as I need more space. I have a lot of files that I like to keep synced with my devices, but don't feel like spending more and more on Dropbox storage, as well as paying the extra money for "Rat Pack" which lets me keep infinite versions of my files, not just the standard 30 days.
Cloud Station does this and more... So far from my two day of testing it, I've successfully implemented this on 2 PC's and 2 Mac's. Syncing is great, super fast since it's local. I'm yet to test it outside of my house, but feel pretty good about it since I use my router's Dynamic DNS address and not my internal network IP (using Asus's dynamic DNS with their router - works awesome btw). I've paused syncing on two machines to simulate offline mode and then changed the same file on both machines in hopes it doesn't overwrite - it worked perfectly. Just like dropbox, it showed a conflicted copy which is what I would want if I have the same file updated from two sources at the same time. Like Dropbox, you can select which folders are synced on each device as well, so my laptop with a SSD doesn't have to get the archived stuff, just the relevant for what I use on the go with my laptop. I'll also note that it appears they are working on a new Cloud Station (in beta now) that somehow integrates with existing cloud storage services (i.e. dropbox, box, etc). I'll update again after I've used that.

Hardware: I haven't had any issues (and coming from a guy that has terrible luck with hardware that says a lot). I have lost power at my house a couple times and the NAS recovered perfectly (home based business with a rack mount UPS). I'm likely going to buy one of the add-on enclosures to add 5 more bays to the drive to expand a bit more.

Tech Support: I did use their Tech Support recently and must say I was extremely impressed with the responsiveness. I had screwed up a setting and woke up one morning realizing I'm out of space on my NAS (ate through 3tb in 8 hours) and kinda freaked out something happened. I contacted support by submitting a ticket, within just an hour or so I received a response to my ticket. He confirmed with me what I thought I did in the ticket and said are you sure you didn't do xyz (as it sounded like I did). He was dead on, but instead of doing the typical Tech Support wait and see method (ask a question, wait for a reply, try this, wait for a reply, etc) in the same email he said if you did do this, here's the solution. If that doesn't work try abc, and if that doesn't work, contact us again and we'll figure it out. Tech support was awesome - everything got worked out and I fixed it (I was creating multiple copies of my media files which were being updated numerous times as I had a process updating the metadata that night). For tech support - these guys are probably the best I've dealt with in many years which is refreshing. (Matt W. for the kudos on their tech support if Synology happens to read this)

Summary: I know this thing is expensive, but honestly - it's still something I would classify as a worthy expense for my business. I'm so happy that Drobo broke on me or I would never have given this a try.

See all 57 customer reviews...More...